Ideal gas temperature and 2nd law TD

adichy
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



As an application of TD and to demonstrate the power of the formalism of differential forms,
show that if one defines the ideal gas temperature TI (T) from the ideal gas equation

p V = N KB TI(T);

this is related to the absolute temperature T (from the second law) by
TI (T) ~ T

Homework Equations



the internal energy U=U(T)

dS= δQ / T

d2S/dVdT = d2S/dTdV

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm having difficulty on how to start the problem and what I'm supposed to be doing. Any direction will be appreciated. =)

thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
What is "TD"? You should always define all acronyms you use, as you can't be sure they're common and everyone will know what you mean.

Since your problem talks about differential forms, you'll probably need to use something like the first law in the form ##dU = \delta Q - p dV##, together with the other "relevant equations" you have.
 
TD is thermodynamics

what is TI(T) though (Ideal temperature?) er... these are the same things (or have always been treated as such when I took graduate thermo) if T doesn't fit the model it's because the ideal model itself failed (reasonable since it has some big assumptions) so what ... they want you to make TI = T by showing for some set of assumptions TI = T? Most likely by using maxwell relationships (or formalism). just my guess.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top