If k, m, and w are known, then r can be calculated.

cameo_demon
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
The following problem is take from Thorton and Marion's Classical Dynamics, 5th edition, p. 408, chapter 10, problem 3.

Given
A puck of mass m on a merry-go-round (a flat rotating disk) has constant angular velocity \omega and coefficient of static friction between the puck and the disk of {\mu}_{s}.Task
Determine how far away from the center of the merry-go-round the hockey puck can be placed without sliding.

Solve

here's my attempt at a solution:

we want the puck to have zero velocity, so that when we integrate velocity with respect to time we get out a constant k, which is our radius from the center.

for the general case:

F = ma_{f} = m\ddot{R}_{f} + ma_{r} + m\dot{\omega} \times r + 2m\omega \times v_{r}

the only force internal to the inertial reference frame is the friction force m\mu_{s}g

and are solving for r for the zero velocity case and constant angular velocity, we can throw out the first two terms as well as the last:

F = m\mu_{s}g = m\dot{\omega} \times r

which allows to say

m\mu_{s}g = mr\omega^{2} \hat{i}

solving for r:

\frac{\mu_{s}g}{\omega^{2}} = r \hat{i}

i feel really shaky about this result because i just don't feel confident about it because a) the thorton and marion book is too high-level and relies too heavily on mathematical formalism which b) i suck at.

any help or comments would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have made the solution too long.

The puck will not slide as long as the static frictional force is less than or equal to the centrifugal force in the rotating frame. The maximum frictional force is k*N. So,

mw^2r = kN = kmg =>
r = kg/w^2.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top