In which direction is the electric field of the point charge

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the direction of the electric field created by a negative point charge situated between two oppositely charged plates. The electric field from the plates runs downwards, while the field from the positive charge radiates outward. The participants clarify that the force on a negative charge, such as the oil drop, will be directed upwards and towards the positive plate. Calculations show the electric field components due to both the fixed charge and the plates, resulting in a net electric field direction. Overall, the negative charge experiences an upward force towards the positive plate.
spiderlegs
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



There is a negative point charge between 2 oppositely charged plates. Positive at top and negative at bottom. The electric field runs downwards from pos to neg.

In which direction is the electric field of the point charge.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I have calculated the value of the electric field and have a positive result. Does this mean that the electric field of the point charge goes upwards because the negative value of the point charge is attracted towards the positive plate.

Any help with field directions would be greatly appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi spiderlegs! Welcome to PF! :smile:

Can you check the wording of the question?
spiderlegs said:
There is a negative point charge between 2 oppositely charged plates. Positive at top and negative at bottom. The electric field runs downwards from pos to neg.

In which direction is the electric field of the point charge.

Do you mean the force on the point charge?

Do you mean the electric field (fromn that plates) at the point charge?

(the electric field of the point charge is simply radial, pointing outwards from the charge :wink:)
Any help with field directions would be greatly appreciated.

The test charge for measuring fields is always positive … you ask what happens to a positive unit charge.

So a positive charge always is attracted along the arrows, and a negative charge is attracted the other way. :smile:
 
Hello there, thanks for your speedy reply. Sorry for being so vague, it wasn't deliberate. However, the question is rather much more complex.

There is a negatively charged oil drop value -6.4 x 10^19 placed 2mm horizontally left of a fixed charge Q, value 2 x 10^11. They are both midway between oppositely charged plates. Positive plate at top 500V.

Calculate the horizontal and vertical components of the electric field at the oil drop due to the plates and the fixed charge Q. Indicate the approximate direction of the net electric field on a diagram.

Attempt at a solution:

The field at the oil drop due to Q has components ε_y=0 and ε_x=-Q/(4πℇ_o r²) .

ε_x= -45000 N C¯¹

The field at the oil drop due to the plates has components ε_x=0 and ε_y=-(∆V/∆y)

ε_y=62500 N C¯¹

For the diagram I have drawn the vertical component in the positive y direction and the horizontal component in the negative x direction with the net force between the two pointing NW.

Does that help?
 
Last edited:
Hello spiderlegs! :smile:
spiderlegs said:
There is a negatively charged oil drop value -6.4 x 10^19 placed 2mm horizontally left of a fixed charge Q, value 2 x 10^11. They are both midway between oppositely charged plates. Positive plate at top 500V.

Calculate the horizontal and vertical components of the electric field at the oil drop due to the plates and the fixed charge Q. Indicate the approximate direction of the net electric field on a diagram.

(btw, why are you using ε? E is usual for an electric field … and ε is terribly difficult to write in an exam, if you want to make it look different from ε0 :wink: also, try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box)

ah! :smile:

Yes, your solution looks fine.

The field at the oil drop due to the plates is down, and the field due to the positive Q is away from Q … total down and away.

The negative oil drop will therefore go up and towards.
 
Thanks very much for your help ..
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top