Index of Refraction, Snell's Law, and Brewster's Angle

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around using Snell's Law to determine the index of refraction for a lab bench based on measurements taken during an experiment. The calculated angle was 50.9 degrees, leading to an index of refraction (n2) of 1.23, which is higher than the expected values reported by peers. It was noted that an index of refraction less than 1 is improbable, as it would imply light travels faster than in a vacuum. The Brewster angle is highlighted as significant for understanding polarization and reflection rather than refraction in this context. The participants seek confirmation of their calculations before submitting their lab report.
alibert0914
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



This was for a lab experiment, and I'm still not sure how this all fits together. We were supposed to use snell's law to find the index of refraction for the lab bench. We measured from the top of the bench to our eye level, and to the center of the bright spot seen through a polaraizer. Height was 0.741 m, and distance was 0.605 m. We used the ref. index of air for n1.


Homework Equations



tan (theta): height/distance

n1sin(theta1) = n2sin(theta2)

thetaB = arctan n2/n1


The Attempt at a Solution



We calculated an angle to be 50.9 degrees. We assumed this to be thetaB, and plugged it in. However, since we were using n1=1 for air, it just seems like a lot of back and forth, and we basically get arctan (thetaB) = n2= 1.23. Most everyone else in the lab seems to have gotten n2 to be less than one. If someone could give us a nudge in the right direction that would be very helpful. Thanks a lot!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
An index of refraction less than 1.0 is rather unlikely I would think.
 
Welcome to PF alibert0914!

I don't think you really need the equation for Snell's law, since refraction is not happening here (EDIT: for the polarization of interest, anyway). If memory serves, the Brewster angle is the angle at which light (with a specific polarization) that is incident upon an interface between two media will be totally reflected (i.e. none of it will be transmitted from the first medium to the second). Since the angle of incidence equals the angle of reflection, the angle you measured was equal to the angle of incidence. So you have

tan(θB) = n2/n1 = n2

= height/distance = 1.22

As for your classmates -- a refractive index less than 1? I think not. This would mean that the speed of light in the lab bench material would be faster than c, the speed of light in a vacuum.
 
Thanks so much everyone! My partner and I just wanted to double check everything before we turn our report in. :biggrin:
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top