Induced EMF from Dropped Steel Beam: Physics Calculation

AI Thread Summary
A 14.2m steel beam dropped from 9.53m generates induced EMF due to its motion through the Earth's magnetic field of 16.4 µT. The calculation of time before impact involves using the kinematic equation, resulting in t = sqrt(2*9.53m/9.8m/s²). The induced EMF can be calculated using Faraday's Law, with the formula for magnetic flux and the velocity of the beam at impact. Substituting the velocity into the induced EMF equation provides the final value. The discussion highlights the application of physics principles to solve the problem effectively.
waywardtigerlily
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
A 14.2m long steel beam is accidentally dropped by a construction crane from a height of 9.53m. The horizontal component of the EArth's magnetic field over the region is 16.4 uT. What is the induced Emf in the beam just before impact with the earth, assuming its long dimension remains in a horizontal plane, oriented perpendicularly to the horizontal component of the Earth's magnetic field?

ok, so I know E= chg flux/chg in time

chg flux = Bl(chg x)

but how do i get a time?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You could try a kinematic approach by solving the position equation for time.

x(t) = x_0+v_0*t+.5gt^2.
x_0 = v_0 = 0
x(t) = .5gt^2 solved for t becomes:
t=sqrt(2*x(t)/g) where x(t) = 9.53 and g = 9.8ms^-2
 
That doesn't seem to be working, anymore ideas? Am i even going about this problem the right way?
 
In all honesty I didnt pay much attention during E&M. Sorry. I believe Faraday's and Lenz's Laws are what your looking for though.
 
\phi = 14.2* B x

Absolute value of emf, v = d\phi \dt = 14.2 *B dx/dt
Induced emf when the pole hit the ground is obtaind by substituting the velocity of the pole when it hits the ground which = sqrt (2gh) where h=9.53m

Note:
Lately I have not been able to view LaTex Formula. I hope the above shows ok in your browser.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top