Induced voltage in rectangular loop

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the induced electromotive voltage (emf) in a rectangular loop within a magnetic field, where one side of the loop is moving. The initial calculations yield a negative voltage expression, which prompts a debate about the sign convention for induced voltage. It is clarified that the sign can vary based on the chosen direction for current flow, with Lenz's law indicating that the induced current opposes changes in magnetic flux. The consensus is that while the algebra is correct, the problem only requires the magnitude of the induced voltage, which is inherently positive. Understanding the direction of the induced current and applying Lenz's law is essential for determining the correct sign of the voltage.
beborche
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


There's a magnetic field B in +\hat{z}. A rectangular loop is lying in the xy-plane. Three sides are static, the 4th one is moving with velocity v along the direction of +\hat{y}, making the rectangular larger and larger. The length of this moving side of the rectangle is L.

Determine an expression for the magnitude of the electromotoric voltage induced in the loop using the flux through the loop.

Homework Equations


1. \Phim=\intBdS
2. ε=-\frac{∂\Phi}{∂t}
3. s = v*t (s = displacement, v = velocity, t=time)


The Attempt at a Solution


Using 1) and 3), with dS=dxdy\hat{z} I get
\Phim=\intBdS = B\int\intdxdy (with limits x:0→L and y:0→y0+v*t) = ... = BL(y0+v*t) = BLy0 + BLvt

Then using 2)
ε=-\frac{∂\Phi}{∂t} = -\frac{∂}{∂t}(BLy0 + BLvt) = -Bvl

Everything here is correct, except the sign in the end. It should, apparently, not be negative. It should be positive, i.e. just Bvl, not -Bvl. I don't understand why. In the answers, the only thing that differs from my solution is their definition of dS. They define it as dS=dxdy(-\hat{z}) instead of dS=dxdy\hat{z}. I don't understand why they define it in (-\hat{z}). Can anyone shed some light on this, please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since the problem says "Determine an expression for the magnitude of...", it seems that the answer should be positive by definition. To say whether it is positive or negative, you need to define a convention for which direction represents positive current flow in the loop. The easiest way to determine the sign in these problems is to use Lenz's law, which says that the induced current will oppose the motion. In this problem, that means that the induced current will flow in a clockwise direction when viewed from above. Is this a positive or negative induced voltage? It depends on your convention. This is probably why the problem only asked for the magnitude of the induced voltage.
 
Yes, magnitude is by definition positive.
 
Ok guys. Thanks for your replies. This was driving me nuts. From your answer, phyzguy, I take it there's no correct way of determining the direction of dS? Whatever floats your boat?
 
Oh yes, the polarity of the voltage is definitely determinable.

The algebra is well defined, based on Maxwell's equations and Stokes' theorem, but you don't need to worry about it if you follow Lenz's law: the induced mag field will always oppose a CHANGE in the existing flux. So, in your case, flux is in the +z direction and increasing as the moving side moves in the +y direction, so the induced field will be in the -z direction to oppose the buildup of flux within the loop. So, if you draw your figure with x along the right , y up and z out of the page, the current must flow clockwise to generate a B field in the -z direction. So the right side of the moving side is + and the left is -.

Physically, you can think of it as follows: force F on a free charge will be qv x B, In your case v = v j and B = B k so F = qv j x B k = qvB i so free charge is going to be forced to the right so that end will have a pile-up of + charge. (I use bold for vectors).
 
@rude man, thanks for your explanation.

Also thanks for pointing me in the direction of Lenz's law. I should've revisited that one before even posting the question here.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top