Insulating Cylindrical Shell, Potential at edge

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric field and potential for a cylindrical insulating shell with specified inner and outer radii and a uniform charge density. The electric field at a distance of 1.81 m from the axis is determined to be 5.76×10^1 N/C, while at 1.52 m, it is 4.35×10^1 N/C. The potential at the outer radius of the shell is calculated using the integral of the electric field, with the potential at the axis set to zero. The final equation used for potential incorporates the charge density, inner radius, and the differential radius element. The user successfully resolved the problem by applying these principles.
wohzah
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A long cylindrical insulating shell has an inner radius of a = 1.37 m and an outer radius of b = 1.60 m. The shell has a constant charge density of 2.70 10−9 C/m3. The picture shows an end-on cross-section of the cylindrical shell.

What is the magnitude of the electric field at a distance of r= 1.81 m from the axis?
5.76×101 N/C


What is the magnitude of the electric field at a distance of r= 1.52 m from the axis?
4.35×101 N/C

If we take the potential at the axis to be zero, what is the electric potential at the outer radius of the shell?


Homework Equations


V=kdq/r

Va - Vb=∫E.da


The Attempt at a Solution


∫ Q*(R^2 - r^2) / 2r *ε0 from the inner radius to the outer radius, my assumption was that since V equals the summation of electric field over the area enclosed, and that since potential was zero at the center, the potential would be equal to the difference in potential due to the electric field. Any insight or help is appreciated.

 
Physics news on Phys.org
hey for those interested I actually sorted myself out on this one, the final equation i used was the integral of rho(r^2 -a^2)*dr / 2 *r* e0 [a,R]. Where rho is the charge density, a is the interior radius, r is a variable, dr is the differential radius element, and e0 is epsilon naught, 8.854e-12.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top