Is My Lagrangian Setup for a Particle on an Inclined Plane Correct?

Rob Hal
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'm looking for some advice on whether or not I'm doing a problem correctly.

The problem is:
A particle of mass m rests on a smooth plane. (the particle starts at r) The plane is raised to an inclination \theta, at a constant rate \alpha, with \theta = 0 at t=0, causing the particle to move down the plane.

So, I'm taking the x to be the distance the particle travels down the slope.

I come up with the following as the Lagrangian:

L = \frac{1}{2} m\dot{x}^2 - mg(r-x)sin\theta

I'm not sure if this is correct.

I would then get the equations of motion to be mgsin\theta - m\ddot{x}=0 and -mgsin(r-x)cos\theta=0.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry for the late reply. In case you're still interested, here's my response to this question.

Rob Hal said:
So, I'm taking the x to be the distance the particle travels down the slope.
I come up with the following as the Lagrangian:
L = \frac{1}{2} m\dot{x}^2 - mg(r-x)sin\theta

The KE term isn't right. It should have 2 terms, and one should contain an \alpha. The PE term is OK.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top