Is negative infinity divided by infinity still indeterminate?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Glamis321
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Infinity Negative
Glamis321
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Just as the title states, I'm working on a problem and have come to negative infinity divided by infinity. Is this an indeterminate form? I know that if they are both positive it is indeterminate, but I can't remember if one being negative makes a difference.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You should post the expression in question. The answer is that it depends and might require more care in taking a limit. For example

\lim_{r\rightarrow\infty} \frac{-r^2}{r^2} = \frac{-\lim_{r\rightarrow\infty} r^2}{\lim_{r\rightarrow\infty} r^2}

has indeterminate numerator and denominator, but the ratio is actually finite. However

\lim_{r\rightarrow\infty} \frac{-r^3}{r^2} = \frac{-\lim_{r\rightarrow\infty} r^3}{\lim_{r\rightarrow\infty} r^2}

is indeterminate.
 
Yes, [-infty/infty] is an indeterminate form, just as [infty/infty] is.
 
I'll give it a shot but I don't know how to use the latex codes.

The original problem was Lim (2x – square root of [4x2+x]),
x->∞

Just by plugging in the ∞, I came up with ∞-∞, which I know is indeterminate. So I multiplied in the conjugate of that function and came up with this.


-x divided by (2x+ sqrt of [4x2+x])
 
Yes. So far, so good. Here it is in LaTeX. Click the expression to see what I did.
\lim_{x \to \infty} \frac{-x}{2x + \sqrt{4x^2 + x}}

You can factor x2 out of both terms in the radical, bringing out a factor of x, which means you can factor x out of the two terms in the denominator.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top