Is the Angle Between Scattered Neutron and Recoiling Proton Always 90 Degrees?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dRic2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hydrogen Neutron
dRic2
Gold Member
Messages
887
Reaction score
225

Homework Statement


Show that when a neutron is scattered from hydrogen, the angle between the laboratory velocities of the scattered neutron and the recoiling proton is always 90°.

Homework Equations


Conservation of momentum
(Conservation of Energy)

The Attempt at a Solution


This isn't a difficult exercise if the collision is assumed to be elastic. In that case straight classical mechanics equations lead to the result. But is this kind of collision always elastic? I mean a neutron hits a proton... It should be elastic after all if you do not go into sub-nuclear physics... If the collision were not to be considered elastic, could I still show the thesis ? I don't think so, but I'm not 100% sure...

Thanks
Ric
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the collision is not elastic it is not true any more - but then you produce new particles or the proton or neutron become something else and asking for the angle becomes meaningless.
 
  • Like
Likes dRic2
As I thought, thanks for confirming.

Anyway I know nothing about "sub"-nuclear physics, but I recall that a neutron and a proton are made of quarks. Is it possible that some of the energy of the collision is lost to "excite" a quark above its ground state? (I don't even know if quarks have energy states so... This is just for fun). If such a thing is possible then I would still have the same two particles, but an inelastic scattering may occur.
 
If you excite one of the particles it is an inelastic process and you get different hadrons. They have different names, although that is just a convention. PDG has a list (not a full list, these are just hadrons with up and down quarks only).
 
  • Like
Likes dRic2
Good to know. Thank you! :)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top