Is the Electric Field at Point (-1,0) Correctly Calculated?

AI Thread Summary
The electric field at point (-1,0) is calculated using the contributions from two charges: -3*10^-6 C at the origin and 6*10^-6 C at (2,0). The total electric field is computed as Etotal = Eq1 + Eq2, resulting in a value of -2.09*10^4 N/C. There is confusion regarding the sign of the result, as a reference site provides a positive answer. The direction of the electric field is determined by the force on a positive charge, indicating that the field should indeed be considered positive. This discrepancy highlights the importance of understanding the vector nature of electric fields and charge interactions.
nyclio
Messages
14
Reaction score
1
Two charges located along the x-axis, (-3*10^-6)C at the origin, and (6*10^-6)C at the point (2,0)

What is the electric field at point -1,0?

i did:

Etotal = Eq1+Eq2

=(k(q1)/r^2) + (k(q2)/(2-r)^2)
=(-2.09*10^4) N/C

Can someone please double check my calculations (i did it a few different ways and i always end up with a negative answer)? I plugged this into http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/e2p.html#c1 and for some reason their answer comes out positive. Which one is correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nyclio said:
Two charges located along the x-axis, (-3*10^-6)C at the origin, and (6*10^-6)C at the point (2,0)

What is the electric field at point -1,0?

i did:

Etotal = Eq1+Eq2

=(k(q1)/r^2) + (k(q2)/(2-r)^2)
=(-2.09*10^4) N/C

Can someone please double check my calculations (i did it a few different ways and i always end up with a negative answer)?
The direction of the field is given by the direction of the force on a unit positive charge (ie. of +1C. ). \vec E = \vec F/q. So, in this case the field is positive.

AM
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top