Just got owned on this exam question

  • Thread starter Thread starter anotherghost
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exam
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics exam question involving two masses, m1 and m2, connected by a rope over a frictionless pulley. The problem requires calculating the acceleration of m1, the tensions in the rope, the angular velocity of the pulley, and the inertia of the pulley, given that m2 descends 2 meters in 5 seconds. Participants suggest using free-body diagrams and Newton's second law rather than conservation of energy to find acceleration. One contributor realizes they can derive the necessary values once they determine the acceleration. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the relationship between linear and angular motion in such problems.
anotherghost
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



You've got two masses, m1 and m2, hanging from opposite ends of a rope that goes over a pulley with radius R. Both the masses are suspended by the rope alone and the pulley is on a frictionless peg. M2 moves down by x2 meters in 5 seconds. I believe that's all the variables we were given - m1, m2, radius R, and 2 meters in 5 seconds. EDIT: The pulley doesn't slip.

Now find the accelleration of m1, the tensions of the rope on each side of the pulley, the angular velocity of the pulley, and the inertia of the pulley.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I have no idea how to do this without being given the mass of the pulley or its inertia.

Started out with m1gx + m2gx = (1/2)m1v^2 + (1/2)m2v^2 + (1/2)I(V/R)^2 + m1g*2x.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since the question asks for acceleration, you probably don't want to use conservation of energy because conservation of energy equations have no acceleration terms. Instead, use plain old free-body diagrams and Newton's second law.

Since the acceleration is constant and d=v0t+(1/2)at^2, you can calculate acceleration with the fact that m2 dropped by 5 m in 2 s. See where this takes you.
 
Oh man, duh. I can't believe I didn't see that. I can get the rest of it if I have that a no problem. Guess I'll just have to chalk that one up to a brain fart, hope I'll still get partial credit. :)
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top