Kinematics of Rigid Bodies in 3D

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a kinematics problem involving rigid bodies in 3D, specifically analyzing the motion of a hoop in relation to a pole. The user defines fixed and rotating axes at the contact point and derives equations for angular velocity and acceleration. An initial error in calculating acceleration is identified, where a factor of 2 was mistakenly included in the final expression. The user resolves the issue by recognizing the omission of a crucial term in the acceleration formula, which corrects the calculations. This highlights the importance of careful term inclusion in kinematic equations for accurate results.
yoft
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Problem 15.18:
J9f4r.jpg


I've defined the positive J (fixed) axis along the pole pointing upwards and the positive X (fixed) axis going to the right, with both centered at the point of contact between the hoop and the pole, which I will refer to as point O. The rotating axes (lower case) are defined along the fixed axes at this particular moment.


Homework Equations


ω=Ω(J) + v/R(k) = Ω(j) + v/R(k)
α=(Ωv)/R(i) <-- derived from the first expression of ω
VA = VO + ω x rA/O + VA/O = v(j) - 2ΩR(k)
aA = aO + α x rA/O + ω x (ω x rA/O) + aA/O = (-2Ω2R-2v2/R)(i)


The Attempt at a Solution



My issue is that my v2/R term in my final acceleration is off by a factor of 2. I get -240 ft/s2(i) when I should be getting -216 ft/s2(i). Can anyone point me towards the step that I multiplied by 2 when I shouldn't have?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually I found the problem, I left off the 2ω x VA/O term in the acceleration formula. That adds in another V2/R term that solves my factor of 2.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top