Load cell question for the experts

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on troubleshooting issues with load cells used for measuring tension in an R&D setting. The user is experiencing discrepancies between expected and actual voltage readings when applying known weights, suggesting a potential scaling issue due to a slight positive bias. Suggestions include plotting voltage versus weight to identify linearity, adjusting the bias voltage, and checking the multimeter's impedance to ensure accurate readings. The conversation emphasizes the importance of verifying sensor calibration and considering the effects of measurement equipment on output. Overall, the user seeks clarity on why their readings do not align with theoretical expectations.
vic92
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello, I must first say that I think this is an excellent forum, I have found some usefull info in the past.(thanks)

The question I have today is about loadcells, I am working in my companys R&D department I am trying to set up a pair of load cells to measure tension. The load cells I am using are brand new. They are rated at 100 lbs each , 10vdc exc. and the are 3mv/v.

I have hooked up 1 l/c to a data aquisiton system I have which is currently meassuring the excitation voltage (10.0vdc) and the output (m/v). I am sure all my readings are correct, because I am using a calibrated multimeter for verification.

I do understand that @ 30mv I should have 100lbs of tension and @ 0 lbs I should have 0 mv or close to. I was told with no load there should be no more that .3 mv positive bias ( which is fine I am reading .08 - .15mv). One question is: does this change the scaling? is it not now 0-30mv? also when I hang a weight (calibrated 5.005lbs +/- .001 ) I get about 1.95 mv which doesn't seem right I think I should be getting about 1.5 mv.
I also tried hanging a 25 lb weight and got a reading of 8.59 mv. which should been closer to about 7.5 mv (according to my math) I am trying to figgure out why my numbers arent meshing, Does any 1 have any ideas?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I'm not really familiar with this sensor, but you could try a few things. Plot the voltages vs weight, up to 100 lb if possible. See how the graph looks like, if it's a straight line that means the whole thing is offset by some constant voltage.

Also, you might want to vary the bias voltage, +/- 0.5 volts, see if the readings change.

It's also the possible the multimeter has a too high impedance, so you could try loading the sensor with maybe a 1K resistor, see if it affect the data. Or vice-versa, it's possible the multimeter represents a too low impedance and sucks out the bias voltage from the sensor. In that case you would need a to check it with a high impedance probe, maybe 10 Megaohm using an oscilloscope.

These are the things I would try first based on limited knowledge of the sensor.

hope that helps.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top