Looking to Prepare for Metric Differential Geometry

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around a course covering advanced topics in differential geometry, including Frenet formulas, curvature, and the Gauss-Bonnet Theorem. A participant expresses concern about their preparedness, given that the course typically requires a background in Real Analysis, despite the professor stating it is not mandatory. They have completed three semesters of calculus, differential equations, and linear algebra but worry about lacking mathematical maturity. Responses suggest that while familiarity with Real Analysis could be beneficial, particularly the implicit function theorem, the course itself may provide sufficient context for understanding these concepts. Recommendations for preparatory resources include exploring Real Analysis texts, with specific titles mentioned, and reaching out to the professor for guidance. Overall, confidence in handling the course material is emphasized for students with a solid foundation in calculus and linear algebra.
Big Crunch
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
This is the course description:

Frenet formulas, isoperimetric inequality, local theory of surfaces in Euclidean space, first and second fundamental forms. Gaussian and mean curvature, isometries, geodesics, parallelism, the Gauss-Bonnet Theorem.

I want to take this class because the professor comes highly recommended, but I'm a little worried that I won't be entirely prepared for it. Normally this class requires Real Analysis as a prerequisite, and even though the professor explicitly states that Analysis isn't required, I fear that not having that background/mathematical maturity will hold me back.

I have taken three semesters of calculus and a course on differential equations and linear algebra. These are all of the prerequisites... but if I were to prepare for this course, where would be a good place to start?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I took a class like that. The only thing we used from real analysis was the implicit function theorem, so it's good to have seen that. But actually, the class itself is where I got a lot more intuition about the implicit function theorem because one of the most natural contexts where it comes up is to prove that some level surfaces of a function on R^3 are "regular surfaces". So, if you're a good student, I think you could handle it already if you really know your stuff from calc 3 and linear algebra.

It wouldn't hurt to look into real analysis, but as far as the implicit function theorem goes, I think the geometry class would be more helpful for understanding it than the other way around, if it's anything like my experience. There are a lot of real analysis books. Not sure what your style is. My favorite is A Radical Approach to Real Analysis for its historical motivation (take the history with a grain of salt, though), but I haven't read that many intro to real analysis books. From what I've heard, I would probably like Understanding Analysis by Abbott.
 
The obvious answer is to ask the professor teaching the course. I'm sure he'd be happy to help you.
 
By looking around, it seems like Dr. Hassani's books are great for studying "mathematical methods for the physicist/engineer." One is for the beginner physicist [Mathematical Methods: For Students of Physics and Related Fields] and the other is [Mathematical Physics: A Modern Introduction to Its Foundations] for the advanced undergraduate / grad student. I'm a sophomore undergrad and I have taken up the standard calculus sequence (~3sems) and ODEs. I want to self study ahead in mathematics...

Similar threads

Back
Top