Lorentz Transformation Question

In summary, the problem involves two particles created in a high-energy accelerator moving in opposite directions. The speed of one particle in the laboratory frame is 0.650c and the speed of each particle relative to the other is 0.950c. To find the speed of the second particle in the laboratory frame, the Lorentz Velocity Transformation Equation is used. The correct solution is 0.784c, but there is a discrepancy with the given solution, possibly due to a typo or a difference in convention. Overall, the solution provided is correct and there is no major error in the reasoning.
  • #1
phisci
10
0

Homework Statement


2 particles are created in a high-energy accelerator and move off in opposite directions. The speed of one particle, as measured in the laboratory is 0.650c, and the speed of each particle relative to the other is 0.950c. What is the speed of the second particle, as measured in the laboratory.


Homework Equations


Lorentz Velocity Transformation Equation.

Vx= Vx'+u/(1+(uVx'/C2))


The Attempt at a Solution


I let S be the frame of reference of the laboratory and S, be the frame of reference of the first particle.

From the question, u=+0.650c and the velocity of the 2nd particle in the S' frame is
Vx'= -0.950c since it is approaching the first particle.

Hence when i plug in the values into the formula, I should get

Vx=[(-0.950+0.650)]c/(1+(-0.950x0.650)) = -0.784c

the speed is hence 0.784c.

However the solution given puts a negative sign to the 0.650 in the denominator. i.e.
Vx=[(-0.950+0.650)]c/(1+(0.950x-0.650))

Why did they negate the 0.650 and not the 0.950? Where have i gone wrong in my reasoning? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Probably just a typo. Your solution is fine.
 
  • #3
You can also use (0.950-0.650)c/1-0.650*0.950) = 0.784c. Since the question doesn't label one direction as positive, and only asks for speed (the magnitude of velocity), it doesn't really matter. I don't know why they chose to deploy the minus signs as they did; maybe it's a trivial difference in convention: which formula they started off with, and how they assigned the variables in this particular problem to those of the general formula etc., or maybe just a typo as vela suggests. I wouldn't lose too much sleep over it ;-)
 
Last edited:
  • #4
okay noted. thanks alot! :)
 
  • #5


I would like to address your question by first clarifying that the Lorentz transformation equations are used to describe the relationships between space and time measurements in different frames of reference. In this case, we are dealing with the velocities of particles in different frames of reference.

Now, let's look at your attempt at a solution. You correctly identified the frames of reference and the velocities of the particles in those frames. However, the Lorentz velocity transformation equation that you used, Vx= Vx'+u/(1+(uVx'/C2)), is actually for the transformation of velocities from the S' frame to the S frame. In this case, we are interested in finding the velocity of the second particle in the S frame, so we need to use the inverse transformation, which is Vx'= (Vx-u)/(1-(uVx/C^2)).

Using this equation, we can calculate the velocity of the second particle in the S frame as Vx'= (0.650c-0.950c)/(1-(0.650c)(-0.950c)/c^2) = 0.784c. This is the same result that you obtained, but with the correct equation.

As for the solution given that puts a negative sign in front of the 0.650 in the denominator, this is because the velocity of the first particle in the S frame is positive (moving away from the observer), while the velocity of the second particle in the S' frame is negative (moving towards the first particle). In the equation, we use the velocities in the respective frames, so the negative sign is necessary to account for the direction of motion.

In summary, your reasoning was correct, but you used the wrong equation for the Lorentz velocity transformation. By using the correct equation, you will get the same answer as the given solution. I hope this helps clarify any confusion.
 

Related to Lorentz Transformation Question

1. What is the Lorentz Transformation?

The Lorentz Transformation is a mathematical equation that describes how the measurements of space and time change for an object when viewed from different reference frames. It was first developed by Dutch physicist Hendrik Lorentz in the late 19th century and later expanded upon by Albert Einstein in his theory of special relativity.

2. Why is the Lorentz Transformation important?

The Lorentz Transformation is important because it helps us understand how the laws of physics, particularly the speed of light, remain consistent in all inertial reference frames. It also forms the basis of Einstein's theory of special relativity, which has significant implications for our understanding of the universe.

3. How does the Lorentz Transformation work?

The Lorentz Transformation involves a set of equations that relate the measurements of space and time in one inertial reference frame to those in another inertial reference frame. It takes into account the effects of time dilation and length contraction, which occur at high speeds, and allows us to calculate the relative velocities of objects.

4. What is the difference between the Lorentz Transformation and Galilean Transformation?

The Lorentz Transformation and Galilean Transformation are two different mathematical equations that describe the measurements of space and time in different reference frames. The main difference is that the Galilean Transformation only applies to objects moving at low speeds, while the Lorentz Transformation takes into account the effects of special relativity at high speeds.

5. Where is the Lorentz Transformation used?

The Lorentz Transformation is used in various fields of physics, including particle physics, astrophysics, and cosmology. It is also used in practical applications, such as in the design of high-speed vehicles and in GPS systems that correct for the effects of relativity. It is an essential tool for understanding the fundamental principles of the universe.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
998
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
10
Views
625
Back
Top