Magnet Repulsion: Stacking 10 Magnets in a Tube

  • Thread starter Thread starter eric davis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Magnets Repulsion
AI Thread Summary
Stacking 10 magnets in a tube with alternating polarities results in a repulsion effect, but the total force when compressed does not simply add up to 100 pounds. Each magnet's repulsion force of 10 pounds does not combine linearly due to the nature of magnetic forces. When compressed, the effective resistance remains equal to the force of the strongest magnet, which is 10 pounds, not the cumulative force of all magnets. The discussion clarifies that in a practical application, such as a truck suspension, replacing a spring with magnets would yield a total repulsion force of only 20 pounds, illustrating the limits of magnetic stacking. Understanding these principles is crucial for applications involving magnetic repulsion in mechanical systems.
eric davis
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Ok I have a question that I cannot find a answer anywhere on the Web for so I'm going to try to explain it best I can. So if I stacked 10 magnets in a plastic tube, s-n-n-s-s-n-n-s-s ect... and each magnet had a repel of 10lbs, would the total repel be 10 pounds when compressed or would it be 100lbs compressed? Or is it like when u stick two magnets together to they loose much of there strength? This has my head hurting.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
eric davis said:
each magnet had a repel of 10lbs
Do you mean ten pounds will "force" contact between two magnets? If so, place the ten pound force against the top magnet in your stack while holding the second in a fixed position --- do they contact? Release the first pair supporting the ten pounds while holding the third fixed --- do the first two magnets plus the ten pounds contact the third?
 
Ok I hope I'm saying this right, I think ur saying what I'm saying but the magnets will be like this in a tube free floating to make like a spring;

n-s (10lbs repulsion) s-n (10lbs repulsion) n-s (10lbs repulsion) s-n.

Now the first magnet is stationary with the other 3 on top in a tube. All repelling each other. Now wen u take just say a pencil, push on the top magnet downward, will this create a spring effect equal to 30lbs? I know when you do only two magnets of equal strength, the resistance is equal. Like one 10 pound to another 10 pound you only get 10 pounds of resistance. But I'm talking about 3 gaps that have to be compressed. I hope that made sense...
 
eric davis said:
n-s (10lbs repulsion) s-n (10lbs repulsion) n-s (10lbs repulsion) s-n.
We can re-write that as somewhat symbolically:
F0-->N1S1<--F12-->S2N2<--F23-->S3N3<--F4

We can do some analysis:

F0 and F4 are the forces on each end of the line of magnets.
Since the whole line of magnets does not accelerate after we have applied the end forces, we can conclude that F0 = F4.

Similarily, since magnet 1 does not accelerate after we have applied the end forces, we can conclude that F12 = F0.

Continuing, we can say F23 = F12, and F4 = F23.

What does that tell you about the applied force will be just enough to close all the gaps between the magnets?
 
Thank you! That does make sense! OK so let's say in a shock that's used in a truck suspension, and in the shock was spring loaded. Take out the spring and replace it with 10-20lbs magnets the total repel force will only be 20lbs then. Thus us exactly what I needed to know.
 
I have Mass A being pulled vertically. I have Mass B on an incline that is pulling Mass A. There is a 2:1 pulley between them. The math I'm using is: FA = MA / 2 = ? t-force MB * SIN(of the incline degree) = ? If MB is greater then FA, it pulls FA up as MB moves down the incline. BUT... If I reverse the 2:1 pulley. Then the math changes to... FA = MA * 2 = ? t-force MB * SIN(of the incline degree) = ? If FA is greater then MB, it pulls MB up the incline as FA moves down. It's confusing...
Hi. I noticed that all electronic devices in my household that also tell time eventually lag behind, except the ones that get synchronized by radio signal or internet. Most of them are battery-powered, except my alarm clock (which runs slow as well). Why does none of them run too fast? Deliberate design (why)? Wrong temperature for quartz crystal? Decreasing battery voltage? Or just a coincidence?
Back
Top