Magnetic field of an infinite sheet of current

AI Thread Summary
An infinite sheet of current in the yz plane generates a magnetic field that is parallel to the sheet and perpendicular to the current direction, with a magnitude of B = μ₀Js/2. To derive this, Ampère's law is applied, requiring a closed path that maintains symmetry for a constant magnetic field along the path. A rectangular loop should be constructed perpendicular to the z-direction to ensure that the current passes through the loop. The integration of the magnetic field along the path confirms that the vertical sides of the rectangle yield zero contribution while the horizontal sides provide the necessary current through the loop. This approach effectively demonstrates the relationship between the current and the resulting magnetic field near the infinite sheet.
JHans
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
An infinite sheet of current lying in the yz plane carries a surface current of linear density Js. The current is in the positive z direction, and Js represents the current per unit length measured along the y axis. Prove that the magnetic field near the sheet is parallel to the sheet and perpendicular to the current direction, with magnitude:

<br /> <br /> B = \frac{\mu_{0} J_{s}}{2}<br /> <br />

To solve this, I know that Ampere's law should be used. It's intuitive from the right-hand rule that the direction of the magnetic field will be parallel to the sheet at points near the sheet. I'm at a loss in terms of how I can go about proving this derivation, though.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The first thing you need to do is to pick a closed path. It's okay to break up the path into a few sections if you need to, as long as all the sections connect together making a closed path. The goal is to pick a path such that due to symmetry, each section of the path has a constant B, parallel to the path.

Ampère's law for magneto-statics (and in a vacuum) is

\oint _P \vec B \cdot \vec{dl} = \mu _0 I.

And remember, the closed path integral can be broken up into several open path integrals, each corresponding to a section of the path, as long as all the integrals form a closed path when put together.

Let's concentrate on the left side of the equation. The goal is that for any given section, \vec B \cdot \vec{dl} is a constant. And just to be clear, \vec B \cdot \vec{dl} is not usually a constant -- you need to pick the pick the appropriate path that makes it a constant.

Let's take the situation where, due to symmetry, the magnitude of B is a constant along the path section, and B is perfectly parallel to dl. Then,

\int _P \vec B \cdot \vec{dl} = \int Bdl = B \int dl = Bl

Now suppose in a different section in the path B is perpendicular to dl. The dot product between perpendicular vectors is zero. So in this case,

\int _P \vec B \cdot \vec{dl} = \int 0 = 0

Given the above, here are a few hints:
  • For your path, try a rectangle.
  • Ampère's law will give you μ0 times the current passing through the rectangle. So make sure the rectangle passes through the sheet/plane (otherwise there wouldn't be any current inside of the rectangle).
  • Even though the plane is infinite, the rectangle doesn't have to be. Let's just assume that the rectangle has a finite length l. But the fact that the plane is infinite is very important, particular when dealing with a couple of sides of the rectangle. So keep in back of your mind that the plane/sheet is infinite in size, even though the rectangle is not.
  • Since the rectangle has 4 sides, feel free to break up the closed path into 4 separate path integrals if you want.
 
Last edited:
Hmm... well, since the infinite sheet of current is along the yz-plane, with current moving in the positive z-direction, it would seem to make sense to construct a rectangular loop along the xz-plane. Then the vertical sides would have the magnetic field perpendicular to the direction of movement, while the horizontal sides would have the magnetic field parallel to the direction of movement.

Is this a wise choice to make? I want to make sure I'm not overlooking something before I go further.
 
JHans said:
Hmm... well, since the infinite sheet of current is along the yz-plane, with current moving in the positive z-direction, it would seem to make sense to construct a rectangular loop along the xz-plane. Then the vertical sides would have the magnetic field perpendicular to the direction of movement, while the horizontal sides would have the magnetic field parallel to the direction of movement.

Is this a wise choice to make? I want to make sure I'm not overlooking something before I go further.
You don't want the rectangular loop on the xz plane. The reason is because in that case, there wouldn't be any current going through the loop. The current would merely go across the side of the loop, but not through the loop.

The current is moving in the z-direction. So for the rectangular path, you want to pick a plane perpendicular to the z-direction (i.e. a plane that has a normal vector parallel to the z-direction). That way, current passes through the rectangle.

Ampère's law only gives you the current passing through the closed path. Any current outside the closed path does not contribute.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top