Magnetic flux density and Hall probe

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on investigating how magnetic flux density varies between two bar magnets using a Hall probe. Calibration of the Hall probe is essential, and using a long straight wire for this purpose is deemed ineffective due to the non-uniform magnetic field it generates. Instead, employing a Helmholtz coil is recommended for producing a uniform magnetic field, which will enhance measurement accuracy. Participants suggest consulting additional resources and experts for precise formulae and methodologies. This approach will ensure a successful and reliable investigation into magnetic flux density.
briton
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
I'm planning an investigation on how magnetic flux density midway between opposite poles of 2 bar magnets varies with separation of the bar magnets (using a Hall Probe). [simply as shown in attachment]

To do this, I'll need to calibrate a hall probe (which I think is done by working out the p.d. (Hall pd) at a known magnetic field strength).

My initial thoughts were that I could use a long straight wire of known current, and use B \ = \ \frac{\mu_0 I }{2 \pi \ r}
however, this would not work would it? Due to non-uniform magnetic field.

Is the best approach to use a "Helmholtz coil" to get a uniform field- and use the formula given here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helmholtz_coils ?

I've never come across this before, so any help / hints would be appreciated. Thanks.
 

Attachments

  • magflux.JPG
    magflux.JPG
    1.7 KB · Views: 498
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
gee u got this paper early
 


It seems like you have a solid plan for your investigation using a Hall probe to measure the magnetic flux density between two bar magnets. The Hall probe is a useful tool for measuring the strength of a magnetic field, and it is important to calibrate it properly before conducting your experiment. You are correct in thinking that a long straight wire of known current would not work due to the non-uniform magnetic field it would produce. Using a Helmholtz coil is a much better approach, as it can produce a more uniform field that will give you more accurate results. The formula you have provided from Wikipedia is a good starting point, but it is always a good idea to do some additional research and consult with your instructor or a physics expert to ensure you have the most accurate and appropriate formula for your specific experiment. Good luck with your investigation!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top