Magnetic flux density and Hall probe

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on investigating how magnetic flux density varies between two bar magnets using a Hall probe. Calibration of the Hall probe is essential, and using a long straight wire for this purpose is deemed ineffective due to the non-uniform magnetic field it generates. Instead, employing a Helmholtz coil is recommended for producing a uniform magnetic field, which will enhance measurement accuracy. Participants suggest consulting additional resources and experts for precise formulae and methodologies. This approach will ensure a successful and reliable investigation into magnetic flux density.
briton
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
I'm planning an investigation on how magnetic flux density midway between opposite poles of 2 bar magnets varies with separation of the bar magnets (using a Hall Probe). [simply as shown in attachment]

To do this, I'll need to calibrate a hall probe (which I think is done by working out the p.d. (Hall pd) at a known magnetic field strength).

My initial thoughts were that I could use a long straight wire of known current, and use B \ = \ \frac{\mu_0 I }{2 \pi \ r}
however, this would not work would it? Due to non-uniform magnetic field.

Is the best approach to use a "Helmholtz coil" to get a uniform field- and use the formula given here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helmholtz_coils ?

I've never come across this before, so any help / hints would be appreciated. Thanks.
 

Attachments

  • magflux.JPG
    magflux.JPG
    1.7 KB · Views: 494
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
gee u got this paper early
 


It seems like you have a solid plan for your investigation using a Hall probe to measure the magnetic flux density between two bar magnets. The Hall probe is a useful tool for measuring the strength of a magnetic field, and it is important to calibrate it properly before conducting your experiment. You are correct in thinking that a long straight wire of known current would not work due to the non-uniform magnetic field it would produce. Using a Helmholtz coil is a much better approach, as it can produce a more uniform field that will give you more accurate results. The formula you have provided from Wikipedia is a good starting point, but it is always a good idea to do some additional research and consult with your instructor or a physics expert to ensure you have the most accurate and appropriate formula for your specific experiment. Good luck with your investigation!
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top