Mass of an electron lab discussion?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on measuring the mass of an electron using a solenoid and the equation m = qB²R²/2V. Key questions include the feasibility of using the Earth's magnetic field for deflecting the electron beam and the practicality of determining the electron's mass without a magnetic field. The conversation emphasizes understanding the underlying physics principles, such as Newton's Second Law, centripetal motion, and magnetic force, which are integral to the equation used in the lab. It suggests that the radius of the electron's path in the Earth's magnetic field can provide insights into the necessary dimensions of the experimental setup. Ultimately, grasping these concepts is crucial for solving the posed questions effectively.
Wh1994
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi, I did a lab for a high school physics class where we measured the mass of an electron using a solenoid and our working equation was this:

m = qB2R2/2V

I was able to do the lab and get good results, but I have discussion questions I don't know how to answer. I can't figure it out. Here are the questions:

Would it be possible to use the Earth's magnetic field to deflect the beam? How large a tube would you need? Assuming the Earth had no magnetic field, would it be practical to determine the mass of an electron by accelerating it horizontally through a known potential difference and subsequently observing its deflection in the Earth's gravitational field?


Homework Equations


e/m ratio?



The Attempt at a Solution


I spent about 2 hours last night trying to think about this problem... I can't figure it out
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your instructor wants you to try to understand your formula, which is based on a few ostensibly disparate concepts that have been combined for you into a neat little package. (Physicists get such a kick out of deriving equations like the one you used in your lab to calculate the mass from the measured parameters). I will lay out the basic physics principles that come into play, first conceptually, and I hope that this will give you a good direction.

Newton's Second Law: force acting on the electron causes it to accelerate, and this acceleration is impeded by the mass of the electron. What is the nature of this acceleration (i.e. speeding up, slowing down, changing direction, or a combination)? Think about the path of the electron: was is straight or curved. Did you measure a rate of CHANGE in speed? What is the origin of the force? The mass of the electron is probably the m in your formula.

centripetal motion: this motion is characterized by a changing direction, and therefore an acceleration, and therefore requires a force. The radius of the circular path here is probably the R in your formula. The speed of the electron is probably the V in your formula.

magnetic force: this is imposed on a charged particle that moves through a magnetic field. The field strength is probably the B in your formula, and the charge is probably the q in your formula.
 
I think the equation you have quoted relates to a well known demonstration. The electrons are accelerated through a voltage V then pass into a region between 2 large coils (your solenoid) These coils are known as Helmholtz coils and produce a uniform magnetic field, B.
This field causes the electrons to travel in a circular path of radius,r, because the force due to the magnetic field is the centripetal force for the electrons.
The magnetic field is calculated from the dimensions of the helmholtz coils and the current flowing through them. If you compare the field you calculated with the Earth's magnetic field it should give you some idea of the radius of the path followed by the electrons in the Earth's field and hence the size of the container.
Do you see how the equation comes about by considering the KE gained by the electrons in the accelerating voltage and the force due to the magnetic field being the centripetal force?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top