Mass of Planet Using Radius and Doppler Effect

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the mass of a distant planet based on the observed Doppler effect of a spacecraft's radio signal. The spacecraft orbits at a radius of 128,000 km, with a wavelength variation between 2.99964 m and 3.00036 m. The initial calculation yielded a mass of approximately 2.48×10^18 kg, which was unexpectedly low compared to the expected range of 10^20-28 kg. A key issue identified was the incorrect unit conversion from kilometers to meters for the radius and the gravitational constant. The participant acknowledged the mistake and expressed gratitude for the clarification.
Linuxkid
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Imagine you are observing a spacecraft moving in a circular orbit of radius 128,000 km around a distant planet. You happen to be located in the plane of the spacecraft 's orbit. You find that the spacecraft 's radio signal varies periodically in wavelength between 2.99964 m and 3.00036 m. Assuming that the radio is broadcasting normally, at a constant wavelength, what is the mass of the planet?


Homework Equations


M= \displaystyle{\frac{rv^2}{G}}; \space<br /> <br /> where \space G= 6.67\times10^{-11} \space m^3 kg^{-1} s^{-2},<br /> <br /> \space r \space is \space km, \space and \space v \ is \space<br /> km/s <br />



The Attempt at a Solution



Well, as we have a change in wavelength 2.99964 m and 3.00036 m respectively, the original signal should equal 3.00000m. With the formula from my textbook ( "Astronomy" 6th edition by Chaisson and McMillan, page 63), \frac{apparent\space \lambda}{true \space \lambda} -1 = speed \space in \space c Then I multiply it by c and convert meters to kilometers and get\approx 36 km/s.

I input r and G as G= 6.67\times10^{-11} \space m^3 kg^{-1} s^{-2}, \space r= 128, 000 km.


So: M= \displaystyle{\frac{(128000km)*(36 km/s)^2}{6.67\times 10^{-11}\space m^3 kg^{-1} s^{-2}}} = 2.48\times10^{18} kg.


When I input this answer into the website in which we do our homework by, it gives me a lousy red X. I'm sure I messed up, because I was expecting a planet approximately in the 10^20-28 kg range.


Regardless, I've been stuck on this for a bit. Help is much appreciated.





Nikos
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Check your units, I think you are not converting km to m.
 
possibly you are using different values for your constants, or you have rounded off differently?
[edit]ah - your value for G has length in meters.
 
Hey there,


Aha! I missed that my constant was in meters.



Honest mistake. Thanks a lot.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top