Masses & Pulley: Balancing Forces with mA, mB, mC

  • Thread starter Thread starter KMjuniormint5
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pulley
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on analyzing a system of three masses connected by cords over a frictionless pulley. The participants derive equations for the forces acting on each mass, specifically focusing on tensions T1 and T2, and the accelerations ax and ay. There is clarification that the acceleration in the x direction (ax) is not zero, as it corresponds to the acceleration of mass A moving left, which is equal to the downward acceleration of masses B and C. A suggested method to simplify the problem involves treating masses B and C as a single system to reduce the number of unknowns. The overall approach emphasizes the importance of correctly applying Newton's second law to solve for the tensions and accelerations in the system.
KMjuniormint5
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
In the figure below, three ballot boxes are connected by cords, one of which wraps over a pulley having negligible friction on its axle and negligible mass. The masses are mA = 22.0 kg, mB = 40.0 kg, mC = 30.0 kg.

figure:

Pulley-----------mA
|
|
|
mB
|
mC

Now I apply Fnet = ma so. . .

the massA in the x direction would be T1 (tension) = (mA)(ax) and in the Y direction n-(mA)(g) = (mA)(ay).
the massB in the y direction would be T1-T2 - (mB)(g) = (mB)(ay)
the massC in the y direction would be T2 - (mC)(g) = (mC)(ay)

but in the equations above wouldn't acceleration in the x direction (ax) = 0? and accel. in the y (ay)direction be (9.8 m/s^2 aka gravity (g))
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No ax isn't 0. The acceleration of mA towards the left equals the acceleration of the hanging masses downwards...

using your conventions ax = -ay.

so you have 3 equations with 3 unknowns... T1, T2 and ax.

One "trick" you can use to simplify calculating T1 and ax, is to take mB and mC together as one system. that way you get 2 equations with 2 unknowns, T1 and ax.

But the 3 equations you have seem fine.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top