Master's or PhD in Nuclear Engineering & more advice

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the decision between pursuing a Master's degree or a PhD in nuclear engineering for a junior physics major. The individual expresses a desire to start working sooner while also valuing the depth of knowledge a PhD could provide. A nuclear physicist in the field shares insights, noting that while a PhD offers extensive background in specific subfields, it may not be necessary for all job roles in nuclear engineering. They emphasize that practical knowledge in areas like materials and systems is often more relevant for engineers. The aspiring student ultimately leans toward a Master's degree, feeling pressured by family and teachers to pursue a PhD but recognizing that the latter may not align with their career goals or interests. The conversation highlights the importance of aligning educational choices with career aspirations and the varying requirements of jobs in the nuclear engineering sector.
neosoul
Messages
29
Reaction score
7
PF,

I am a junior physics major hoping to work in nuclear engineering. The problem is that I would like to stay in school to get a PhD. I have a love of learning. However, I would like to get a Master's degree to start working and making a living earlier. I would not like to work in academia, but I feel like I could learn more of what is needed on the job with a PhD.

Should I go for a master's degree or PhD? Also, what classes can I take to increase my chances of being accepted into a nuclear engineering graduate program?
 
Why do you feel you could learn more what is required on the job by doing a PhD?

A PhD would give you more background on certain subfields, but depending on what job you would find in nuclear this would either be obsolete or just background.

I am a nuclear physicist working in nuclear power and I feel some more background would be useful. I am however aware that I know more on nuclear physics and reactor physics than many engineers that start in our company. They know more about other fields like materials, systems etc. For this and to broaden my knowledge of nuclear engeering (specifically reactor theory and nuclear thermal hydraulics) is why I am now pursuing a MSc in nuclear engineerng after hours.

What I am basically saying is that your requirements for a job depend on what your expectations for a future job are. Maybe based on your preferences somebody can give you a more appropriate answer.
 
  • Like
Likes neosoul
eXorikos said:
Why do you feel you could learn more what is required on the job by doing a PhD?

A PhD would give you more background on certain subfields, but depending on what job you would find in nuclear this would either be obsolete or just background.

I am a nuclear physicist working in nuclear power and I feel some more background would be useful. I am however aware that I know more on nuclear physics and reactor physics than many engineers that start in our company. They know more about other fields like materials, systems etc. For this and to broaden my knowledge of nuclear engeering (specifically reactor theory and nuclear thermal hydraulics) is why I am now pursuing a MSc in nuclear engineerng after hours.

What I am basically saying is that your requirements for a job depend on what your expectations for a future job are. Maybe based on your preferences somebody can give you a more appropriate answer.

Thank you so much for responding. It was very helpful. I really want to just go for a masters but I was so worried about what my family and teachers would think. My teachers want me to go because they think it is best for me. My family just has very high expectations of me. However, I am not looking forward to the tediousness of pursuing a PhD and I do now feel like a PhD would be useless. Your response gave me some clarity.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top