Material Strength: Thickness vs. Thinness Explained

AI Thread Summary
Material strength is primarily determined by the material itself rather than its geometry, although thickness can introduce variations, especially in very thin pieces. Load capacity is a key measurement when comparing thicknesses, such as 14 gauge versus 16 gauge sheet metal, as it reflects a combination of material strength and geometry. However, it is misleading to claim that thicker materials are inherently stronger, as factors like localized material issues and non-linear deformations can affect performance. Plywood complicates this further due to its non-homogeneous and non-isotropic nature, which leads to varying properties based on layer orientation and moisture content. Understanding stresses is essential for accurately comparing the strength of different material thicknesses.
denver75
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I understand the distinctions of the different types of material strengths, but I get stumped when asked about how they apply when the material discussed is thicker or thinner. Any help?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org


Theoretically the material strengths are a function of material only, not geometry. However, in real practice, there can be slight variations, particularly when talking about very thin pieces. This can occur due to localized material problems along with some non-linear deformations when the part is loaded.
 


Thanks minger-
So in the discussion of how "strong" different thicknesses of materials are compared to each other, what would be the proper measurement? How can I describe 14 gauge vs 16 gauge sheet metal, or 1/2" plywood vs 3/4"?



minger said:
Theoretically the material strengths are a function of material only, not geometry. However, in real practice, there can be slight variations, particularly when talking about very thin pieces. This can occur due to localized material problems along with some non-linear deformations when the part is loaded.
 


Load capacity is probably the best way. A 14 gauge can carry more than 16 gauge, you've got to be careful though as this isn't material strength, its a funny combination of material strength and geometry.

So to say a thick sheet of metal is stonger than a thin sheet in the materal sense is wrong. Plywood is also a dodgy example as its non homogeneous. So it can have different material strengths depending on how the layers are oriented.
 


denver75 said:
So in the discussion of how "strong" different thicknesses of materials are compared to each other, what would be the proper measurement?
You would still want to talk about stresses. Stresses are the great equalizer when it comes to talking and comparing scenarios and materials.

Plywood is actually pretty tough because of a few reasons:
1) It is non-homogeneous, i.e. it's properties will vary due to the nature of wood and adhesives.
2) It is non-isotropic, i.e. it's material properties usually are not the same in all directions like most metals.
3) It's properties will depend greatly on moisture content.
 
Thread 'How can I find the cleanout for my building drain?'
I am a long distance truck driver, but I recently completed a plumbing program with Stratford Career Institute. In the chapter of my textbook Repairing DWV Systems, the author says that if there is a clog in the building drain, one can clear out the clog by using a snake augur or maybe some other type of tool into the cleanout for the building drain. The author said that the cleanout for the building drain is usually near the stack. I live in a duplex townhouse. Just out of curiosity, I...
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
Back
Top