Maths problem: deriving expressions for the critical temperature/volume/pressure

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the critical temperature, volume, and pressure for a van der Waals gas. The equations provided include the van der Waals pressure equation and the conditions for the point of inflection in the (V,p) graph. The user successfully derived expressions for V and T, confirming they matched the expected critical values. Additionally, the relationship between the derived equations allows for the calculation of critical pressure. The insights gained are particularly relevant for applications involving critical fluids, despite the limitations of the van der Waals equation for certain gases like CO2.
Lisa...
Messages
189
Reaction score
0
I have to show that for a van der Waals gas the critical temperature, volume and pressure are given by:

T_c= \frac{8a}{27bR}

V_c= 3nb

p_c= \frac{a}{27b^2}

I started off this way:

Van der Waals states that for a non ideal gas the pressure is:

P = \frac{nRT}{V-nb} - a \frac{n^2}{V^2}

with a and b constants...

The point of inflection of the (V,p) graph is the critical volume + temperature. Therefore this point is given by the conditions:

\frac{\delta p}{\delta V} =0

\frac{\delta ^2 p}{\delta V^2} =0

I came to the conclusion that these conditions are:

\frac{\delta p}{\delta V} = - \frac{nRT}{(V-nb)^2} + \frac{2an^2}{V^3}=0

\frac{\delta ^2 p}{\delta V^2} = \frac{2 nRT}{(V-nb)^3} - \frac{6an^2}{V^4}=0

Now how do I obtain V /Tfrom these two equations?
I believe I need to set the second equation equal to 0 and solve for V & T. Then substitute the answer in the first one and show that it also equals 0.
Only: how do I get an expression for V & T?! I've done the following:

\frac{2 nRT}{(V-nb)^3} - \frac{6an^2}{V^4}=0

\frac{2 nRT}{(V-nb)^3} = \frac{6an^2}{V^4}

\frac{nRT}{(V-nb)^3} = \frac{3an^2}{V^4}

What steps should I take next? Please help me o:)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Two equations and three unknowns? Think there might be a third relation laying around somewhere? See anything you can easily eliminate by rearranging your two derivatives?
 
I think I've managed to solve the problem:

I've used the second derivative to obtain an expression for T, then I've substituted it into the first one and solved for V. This expression matched the given one, so I knew I was on the right track. Next I've substituted the expression for V into the one I had for T and simplified, which also gave me the given expression. Finding p was really easy by then (with filled in values for V and T in the van der waals formula)...

Thanks anyways for trying to help :)
 
Lisa!

You had :

\frac{nRT}{(V-nb)^2} = \frac{2an^2}{V^3}

and

\frac{2 nRT}{(V-nb)^3} = \frac{6an^2}{V^4}

Dividing one by the other directly gives you Vc = 3nb. Plug this into either of the two to find Tc. Plug Vc and Tc into the Van der Waals equation to find Pc.
 
These will be quite useful for people working with critical fluids, particularly for Carbon dioxide capture, transportation and storage. Needless to say that Van der Waals EoS is not valid for CO2!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top