Matrix representations of angular momentum operators

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the matrix representations of the angular momentum operators \hat{L}_x, \hat{L}_y, and \hat{L}_z for \ell=1. The matrix for \hat{L}_z is established as diagonal, while the participants explore using raising and lowering operators to derive \hat{L}_x and \hat{L}_y. The raising operator \hat{L}_+ and lowering operator \hat{L}_- are calculated, leading to the expressions for \hat{L}_x and \hat{L}_y. The resulting matrices satisfy the necessary commutation relations and the identity condition. This approach effectively demonstrates the relationship between angular momentum operators in quantum mechanics.
thecommexokid
Messages
68
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



Write down the 3×3 matrices that represent the operators \hat{L}_x, \hat{L}_y, and \hat{L}_z of angular momentum for a value of \ell=1 in a basis which has \hat{L}_z diagonal.

The Attempt at a Solution



Okay, so my basis states \left\{\left|\ell,m\right\rangle\right\} are \left|1,-1\right\rangle, \left|1,0\right\rangle, and \left|1,1\right\rangle. \hat{L}_z\left|\ell, m\right\rangle=\hbar m\left|\ell,m\right\rangle, so the matrix representation of \hat{L}_z is easy: \hat{L}_z \doteq \left( \begin{array}{ccc} -\hbar & & \\ & 0 & \\ & & \hbar \end{array} \right). But I don't know what to do in order to determine \hat{L}_x and \hat{L}_y.

Homework Equations



The commutation relations \left[ \hat{L}_x, \hat{L}_y \right] = i\hbar \hat{L}_z, etc., could maybe be useful but I'm not sure how.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes you should also use the fact that the matrices should be linearly independent (they form a so(3) basis).

The commutation relations give you 3 equations, plus if needed you can use the fact that the sum of the squares must be prorportional to the identity.

You should be able to find them by solving the system of equations.
 
You could express ##\hat{L}_x## and ##\hat{L}_y## in terms of the raising and lowering operators. The matrices for the latter are easy to write down.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
vela said:
You could express ##\hat{L}_x## and ##\hat{L}_y## in terms of the raising and lowering operators. The matrices for the latter are easy to write down.

Thank you so much for your suggestion. Here's my attempt at following it. I know that$$\begin{align*}
\hat L_+\left|1,-1\right\rangle &= \hbar\sqrt{2} \left|1,0\right\rangle \\
\hat L_+\left|1,0\right\rangle &= \hbar\sqrt{2} \left|1,1\right\rangle \\
\hat L_+\left|1,1\right\rangle &= 0
\end{align*}$$ and $$\begin{align*}
\hat L_-\left|1,-1\right\rangle &= 0 \\
\hat L_-\left|1,0\right\rangle &= \hbar\sqrt{2} \left|1,-1\right\rangle \\
\hat L_-\left|1,1\right\rangle &= \hbar\sqrt{2} \left|1,0\right\rangle.
\end{align*}$$
From these statements we can work out that $$\hat L_+\doteq \left(\begin{array}{ccc}
0 & 0 & 0 \\
\hbar\sqrt2 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & \hbar\sqrt2& 0
\end{array}\right)$$ and $$\hat L_-\doteq \left(\begin{array}{ccc}
0 & \hbar\sqrt2 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & \hbar\sqrt2 \\
0 & 0 & 0
\end{array}\right).$$ I know the raising and lowering operators are defined as $$\begin{align*}
\hat L_+ &= \hat L_x + i\hat L_y \\
\hat L_-&= \hat L_x - i\hat L_y.
\end{align*}$$ So, in reverse, we can say that $$\begin{align*}
\hat L_x &= \tfrac12 \left(\hat L_+ + \hat L_-\right) \doteq \frac{\hbar}{\sqrt2} \left(\begin{array}{ccc}
0 & 1 & 0 \\
1 & 0 & 1 \\
0 & 1 & 0
\end{array}\right)\\
\hat L_y &= \tfrac{1}{2i} \left(\hat L_+ - \hat L_-\right) \doteq \frac{\hbar}{\sqrt2} \left(\begin{array}{ccc}
0 & i & 0 \\
-i & 0 & i \\
0 & -i & 0
\end{array}\right).
\end{align*}$$ As a check, these matrices uphold both the commutation relations and the sum-of-the-squares identity kevinferreira mentioned above.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top