Max. velocity with given coefficient of static friction (μ_s)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the maximum speed a car can safely navigate a banked curve with a given coefficient of static friction. The initial attempt used the formula v = (μ_s * g * r)^1/2, yielding an incorrect speed of 56.5 km/h, while the actual answer is 100 km/h. Participants emphasize the importance of considering the banking angle of 23.5 degrees and the correct force diagrams to derive the equations of motion. The conversation highlights confusion over the application of static friction and the need for a proper understanding of forces acting on the car. Ultimately, a correct approach involves analyzing forces in both horizontal and vertical directions to find the maximum safe speed.
Hendrick
Messages
41
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A car goes around a curved stretch of flat roadway of radius R = 104.5 m. The magnitudes of the horizontal and vertical components of force the car exerts on a securely seated passenger are, respectively, X = 236.0 N and Y = 572.0 N.

This stretch of highway is a notorious hazard during the winter months when it can be quite slippery. Accordingly the DMV decides to bank it at an angle φ = 23.5 ° to the horizontal.

(1) What is the maximum speed at which the car could safely negotiate this banked curve during a wintry night when the coefficient of static friction between the road and tyres is μs = 0.24 ?


Homework Equations



F_s = (m*v^2)/r
F_s = μ_s * n
n = m*g
where n is the normal force and μ_s is the coefficient static friction.


The Attempt at a Solution



v = ((F_s*r)/m)^1/2
v = ((μ_s*n*r)/m)^1/2
v = ((μ_s*m*g*r)/m)^1/2
v = (μ_s*g*r)^1/2

v = (0.24*9.81*104.5)^1/2 * 3.6 (to convert ms^-1 to kmh^-1)
= 56.5 kmh^-1 (3sf)

Actual answer is 100 kmh^-1 (to 3sf)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For one thing, you didn't take into account that the curve is now banked at an angle of 23.5 degrees. That's important.
 
the equations should be:
fcos(\phi)-\frac{mv^2sin(\phi)}{R}-Nsin(\phi)=0
mg-Ncos(\phi)-fsin(\phi)=0
with the appropiate sketch it's also understood why.
and ofcourse f=mu*N.
 
Last edited:
loop quantum gravity said:
the equations should be:
fcos(\phi)-\frac{mv^2sin(\phi)}{R}-Nsin(\phi)=0
mg-Ncos(\phi)-fsin(\phi)=0
with the appropiate sketch it's also understood why.
and ofcourse f=mu*N.

I still don't quite understand why I can't use the v = (μ_s*g*r)^1/2 formula.
For this question I used it:

At what speed could the car now negotiate this curve without needing to rely on any frictional force to prevent it slipping upwards or downwards on the banked surface?

v = (μ_s*g*r)^1/2
v = (tanφ*g*r)^1/2
v = (tan23.5*9.81*104.5)^1/2 * 3.6 (to convert ms^-1 to kmh^-1)
= 76.0 kmh^-1 (3sf)
 
you can't use this formula, cause the force diagram of yours is incorrect.
i reackon you have a sketch of the problem, look at it and then draw the forces.
this question is a question of statics, the maximum speed is reached when there it neither slips to the sideways or inwards of the road, this we get when the net force is zero.
 
loop quantum gravity said:
you can't use this formula, cause the force diagram of yours is incorrect.
i reackon you have a sketch of the problem, look at it and then draw the forces.
this question is a question of statics, the maximum speed is reached when there it neither slips to the sideways or inwards of the road, this we get when the net force is zero.

I did draw a diagram originally to get part a of the question and it was right. The only thing that has changed is that they gave me a coefficient of static friction. It should be the same diagram still since the angle of 23.5 degrees still applies...

I got two questions from it (the x and y components):

1) Sigma F_x = m.g.sinφ - F_s = m.a_x = 0
2) Sigma F_y = n - m.g.cosφ = m.a_y = 0

I have tried using your equations in every way but I get no where near the answer, would you be so kind and provide me with a helpful hint to steer me in the right direction? I'm really going around in circles at the moment :(...

---Thanks
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top