Measuring sum of two components of spin angular momentum

FarticleFysics
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



What are the possible results of the measurement of the sum of the x and z components of the spin angular momentum of a spin-1/2 particle?

Sx = Spin angular momentum operator x
Sz = Spin angular momentum operator x


Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution



I started by applying the spin-up eigenket to the sum of the spin angular momentum operators.

(Sx + Sz) | up > = Sx | up > + Sz | up > = -1/2h_bar + 1/2h_bar = 0

The text I'm using proves that Sx | up > = 1/2h_bar | down >
and like wise Sx | down > = 1/2h_bar | up >

Does this mean if you were to probe the particle for spin up in the x direction you would actually see spin down?

then I applied the spin down eigen-ket to pull the possible eigenvalues from the operators.

(Sx + Sz) | down > = Sx | down > + Sz | down > = +1/2h_bar + (-1/2h_bar) = 0

I feel that there is something wrong with how I've gone about calculating this.. I know that Sx and Sz don't commute therefore you cannot measure their eigenvalues simultaneously. Since I get zero did I show this correctly?

Also, the eigenkets for spin up and spin down are considered the eigenvectors, correct?

I am still trying to get the hang of the linear algebra and what everything means so any help would be amazing!

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One problem with your work is that saying, for example, that ##\hat{S}_x \lvert \text{up} \rangle = \frac{\hbar}{2}## doesn't make sense. This is akin to writing
$$\frac{\hbar}{2}\begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ 1 & 0 \end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix} 1 \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} = \frac{\hbar}{2}.$$ The lefthand side is a vector, but the righthand side is a scalar.

Does this mean if you were to probe the particle for spin up in the x direction you would actually see spin down?
No. Rid yourself of the notion that taking a measurement means applying the associated operator to a state.

The result of a measurement is one of the eigenvalues of the associated observable. Given the state of a particle, you can calculate the probability amplitude for a particular result by finding the projection of this state in the direction of the corresponding eigenstate. For example, if you were measuring the spin in the z-direction, you would need to know the eigenvalues of ##\hat{S}_z##, which are ##\pm \hbar/2##, and the corresponding eigenstates, ##\lvert + \rangle## and ##\lvert - \rangle##. If the particle is in state ##\psi##, the probability amplitude for finding the particle in the spin-up state is ##\langle + \vert \psi \rangle##, which is generally a complex number. The probability is given by square of the modulus of the amplitude.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top