Mermaid fin vs. conventional flipper

  • Thread starter Thread starter Andrew Buren
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the potential benefits of designing a scuba flipper that utilizes a single up-and-down stroke, contrasting it with the traditional scissor kick. Participants note that the "mermaid kick" can lead to increased fatigue and drag due to the engagement of the entire body. Concerns are raised about the potential for lower back strain with this technique. However, advancements like DARPA's new device demonstrate that a dolphin kick can be significantly more efficient, achieving up to 80% propulsion efficiency compared to the 15% of standard swim fins. The conversation highlights the ongoing evolution of underwater propulsion technology and its implications for efficiency in diving.
Andrew Buren
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
This is just something I was thinking about...
would it be better to design a scuba flipper that has only one up and one down stoke for every cycle instead of the scissor kick? If so (or not) what would be the advantages and disadvantages?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
If you've ever scuba-dived and tried "mermaid kicking" with both fins together, you quickly realize it is a less efficient use of your gloriously separate legs. You will get tired more quickly and your drag through the water is somewhat increased because your whole body has to get into the act.
 
Yes I do dive. However, could it be posible that you think it less efficient because we are used to the conventional way?
 
Last edited:
I can't swim any more, and only used fins for snorkeling anyhow, but my impression is that a 'mermaid' kick would soon cause painful stress to your lower back muscles.
 
Actually, with the right bit of kit, the dolphin-kick can be much more efficient than the scissors-kick. DARPA has developed http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/4223354.html" for exactly that reason. They claim that while swim fins are about 15% efficient and turning muscle power into propulsion, this device approaches 80%. In trials, it has doubled the sustainable speed at which SEALS can travel underwater without a vehicle.

http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/military/darpas-powerswim-brings-out-the-aquaman-in-you-318195.php" that has a video of the device in action. I see that the guys who actually came up with the winning design are the same folks who invented the SequeTM
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I have Mass A being pulled vertically. I have Mass B on an incline that is pulling Mass A. There is a 2:1 pulley between them. The math I'm using is: FA = MA / 2 = ? t-force MB * SIN(of the incline degree) = ? If MB is greater then FA, it pulls FA up as MB moves down the incline. BUT... If I reverse the 2:1 pulley. Then the math changes to... FA = MA * 2 = ? t-force MB * SIN(of the incline degree) = ? If FA is greater then MB, it pulls MB up the incline as FA moves down. It's confusing...
Back
Top