Molar heat capacity and Degrees of freedom

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the molar heat capacity of an ideal diatomic gas and its relationship with degrees of freedom at varying temperatures. It highlights three discrete plateaus corresponding to translational, rotational, and vibrational motions, explained by the equipartition theorem, which states that energy is distributed among degrees of freedom when a system is in equilibrium. The smooth curve between the plateaus reflects the gradual transition in energy absorption as temperature increases, rather than abrupt changes. Questions remain regarding the specific temperature thresholds for the activation of rotational and vibrational motions, as well as the uniformity of energy distribution among molecules. Understanding these concepts is crucial for grasping the behavior of gases under different thermal conditions.
Effect
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The diagram shows the molar heat capacity of an ideal diatomic gas and the number of degrees of freedom at different temperatures. Explain why there are 3 discrete plateaus and why the curve is smooth and leaning between them.
?temp_hash=89f462dcd1470a94962b4b9e31d76d87.png


Homework Equations


-

The Attempt at a Solution


For f=3 degrees of freedom we have translational motion, for f=5 we have also rotational motion and for f=7 there is also vibrational motion.

The equipartition theorem states that if a system is in equilibrium, there is an average energy of (1/2)kT per molecule or (1/2)RT per mole associated with each degree of freedom. The equipartition theorem fails if the thermal energy that can be transferred in collisions is smaller than the energy gap between quantized energy levels.

For example, the energy that can be transferred between colliding gas molecules is of the order of kT, the
typical thermal energy of a molecule. Hence in that case there are three distinct plateaus that represents the change in accordance with the quantized energy levels.

That explains why there are 3 discrete plateaus. What I wonder is why is the curve smooth and leaning between these plateaus? Could someone please explain that?
 

Attachments

  • diagram.png
    diagram.png
    1.7 KB · Views: 1,787
Physics news on Phys.org
A fast response to this would be appreciated :rolleyes:
 
Effect said:
The equipartition theorem fails if the thermal energy that can be transferred in collisions is smaller than the energy gap between quantized energy levels.

For example, the energy that can be transferred between colliding gas molecules is of the order of kT, the
typical thermal energy of a molecule. Hence in that case there are three distinct plateaus that represents the change in accordance with the quantized energy levels.
Doesn't seem to me you've really explained why the number of degrees of freedom increases at certain temperature thresholds. E.g., why does rotation have a higher threshold than translation? (Btw, I don't know the answer to that.)
why is the curve smooth and leaning between these plateaus? Could someone please explain that?
Do all molecules have the same energy at once?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top