Moment Arm: Determine Torque Vector & Qty

AI Thread Summary
To determine the torque vector and quantity, the torque is calculated as T = 100 lbs x 2 ft, resulting in 200 ft-lbs. The force is applied at the mass center, with the force vector directed straight down from that point. This is crucial for calculating torque about the axle, while the direction of the linear force at the axle is less significant. The 200 ft-lbs of torque will cause a counterclockwise (CCW) rotation of the stationary axle, regardless of the force's attachment point. The path of the rigid member from the axle to the force application point does not affect the torque calculation.
Pinon1977
Messages
126
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


I'm trying to determine the torque vector and quantity of said vector per the sketch attached.

Homework Equations



T=fd[/B]

The Attempt at a Solution



T = 100 lbs x 2 f2f
T= 200 ftlbs

But my real question is where is that Force being applied at is it the attachment point to the axle or is it relative to its position in space and the vector would be straight down?
 

Attachments

  • 20180419_211140_HDR.jpg
    20180419_211140_HDR.jpg
    54.7 KB · Views: 478
Physics news on Phys.org
Pinon1977 said:
where is that Force being applied
The weight acts at the mass centre of the mass, so you would draw the force vector straight down from there. This is important for determining the torque it has about the axle, but for the purpose of figuring out the linear force at the axle the line of action does not matter, only the direction.
 
Ok, noted. So the 200ft lbs in this instance would be twisting the stationary axle in a CCW direction? Even though its attached to the opposite side of the acting force?
 
Pinon1977 said:
Ok, noted. So the 200ft lbs in this instance would be twisting the stationary axle in a CCW direction? Even though its attached to the opposite side of the acting force?
Yes. The path the rigid member takes from axle to point of application of force is irrelevant. You could make the member an entire disc centred on the axle.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top