Motor sizing query for design project.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on motor sizing for an engineering cleaning application involving a cylindrical block that weighs 92kg and operates within a vacuum chamber. The user seeks to determine the appropriate motor power to achieve a minimum speed of 500 RPM, emphasizing the importance of calculating friction losses and acceleration requirements. They note that these calculations can be complex and may require experimental data. As a practical solution, oversizing the motor is suggested, as it could be more cost-effective than the labor involved in precise calculations. This approach balances performance needs with engineering efficiency.
ukmitch86
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi there - this is my first post and I hope one of many to come!

My query is a relatively simple one; I'm working with an engineering cleaning application where fluid will be fed into a cylindrical block and spun out into a surrounding container.

The block is 3.5m long and ∅0.140m, weighing in at 92kg. It sits inside a vacuum chamber weighing 48.6kg, total 140.6kg.

I think a belt drive solution will be most practical from a design perspective, and I'm trying to size the motor to drive the load at a frequency of minimum 500RPM.

It's a long time since I've done this sort of calculation.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I would first and foremost look at the power requirement. How many watts of power do you need? For that you need:
  1. The friction losses at maximum speed. Usually, that can not be calculated, but only determined by experiment.
  2. The acceleration requirements. How much time is allowed to go from zero to full speed. That can be paired with the masses and moments of inertia of rotating pieces, and apply F=ma.
If those calculations prove difficult, the most common practical solution is to oversize the motor. The additional cost of a motor that may be 3-10 x bigger than your needs, may be cheaper that the cost of your engineering labor to calculate the minimum size.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top