MPA calculation VS MPA listed on materials

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion surrounding the calculation of MPA (Mega Pascal) from tensile strength values. The original poster calculated an MPA of .0035163 from a tensile strength of .51 PSI, leading to confusion when comparing this to much higher MPA values listed for materials like glass. Participants clarified that MPA is a unit of pressure and emphasized the importance of proper unit conversion. The conversation highlights the significant difference between PSI and MPA, illustrating that .51 PSI is a very low pressure. Understanding these units is crucial for accurately selecting materials based on their strength properties.
Ed Kelly
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am not a mathematician or scientist or student. In advance I ask that you please excuse my ignorance. I calculated that at tensile strength of .51 equals an MPA of .0035163. Thank god for internet calculators. I do not know what MPA means, but materials are listed this way. So if I want to choose a material with an MPA of greater than .0035163 and I look at the MPA of materials, the MPA listed seems mammoth in comparison and defies logic. For example, glass is listed as having an MPA of 60. So what am I missing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry - .51 PSI
 
Ed Kelly said:
Sorry - .51 PSI

Yeah, but did you get DEvans answer of what MPA means (to be accurate, it should be written as MPa)? You never indicated if by that information, you realize that this is a psi to MPa unit conversion.

Zz.
 
Oh. For 0.51 PSI you don't need much of a container. You could probably get that much pressure from a party balloon.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?
Back
Top