N-slit Interference/Diffraction

  • Thread starter Thread starter Warr
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the intensity equations for N-slit interference and the confusion surrounding the transition from two slits to N slits. The intensity for two slits is given as A^2={A_2}^2(sin^2(φ/2)/(φ/2)^2)cos^2(β/2), while for N slits, it is A^2={A_N}^2(sin^2(φ/2)/(φ/2)^2)(sin^2(Nβ/2)/sin^2(β/2)). A participant questions whether substituting N=2 in the N-slit equation results in an expression that is four times the two-slit equation, suggesting a possible error. The consensus is that the peak intensity should indeed be proportional to the number of slits squared, affirming the mathematical relationships involved. This highlights the importance of careful manipulation of the equations in optics.
Warr
Messages
119
Reaction score
0
Hi, having trouble determining whether my lab book has made an error, or I have.

Intensity as a function of \phi for 2 slits is given as

A^2={A_2}^2\frac{sin^2(\frac{\phi}{2})}{{(\frac{\phi}{2})}^2}cos^2(\frac{\beta}{2})

but then it gives the amplitude for N slits to be

A^2={A_N}^2\frac{sin^2(\frac{\phi}{2})}{{(\frac{\phi}{2})}^2}\frac{sin^2(\frac{N\beta}{2})}{sin^2(\frac{\beta}{2})}

However, when I sub in N = 2 for the equation (2), and use the double angle formula to reduce the right fraction in equation (2) I get 4*equation(1) rather than just the equation(1) alone. Am I doing it wrong?

To be more succinct, isn't \frac{sin^2(\frac{N\beta}{2})}{sin^2(\frac{\beta}{2})} = 4cos^2(\frac{\beta}{2})?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't have my optics references handy, but I don't think you're doing anything wrong.

Warr said:
but then it gives the amplitude for N slits to be

A^2={A_N}^2\frac{sin^2(\frac{\phi}{2})}{{(\frac{\phi}{2})}^2}\frac{sin^2(\frac{N\beta}{2})}{sin^2(\frac{\beta}{2})}
I'd say that should be:
A^2={A_0}^2\frac{sin^2(\frac{\phi}{2})}{{(\frac{\phi}{2})}^2}\frac{sin^2(\frac{N\beta}{2})}{sin^2(\frac{\beta}{2})}

It makes sense that the peak intensity should be proportional to the number of slits squared.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top