Necessity to discharge capacitors in circuits

AI Thread Summary
Discharging capacitors before experiments is crucial for accurate results. In series circuits, each capacitor can hold different voltages, and failing to discharge them can lead to unexpected voltage readings due to accumulated charge. Conversely, in parallel circuits, the voltage across all capacitors remains the same, making discharge less critical. However, to ensure consistency and reliability in both configurations, discharging is recommended. Proper discharge techniques, such as connecting a wire between the capacitor's terminals, are essential for safe experimentation.
BluFoot
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement

1. Is it necessary to discharge the capacitors before starting the experiment in series? Why?

2. Is it necessary to discharge before starting the experiment in parallel? Why?

The attempt at a solution

For the first one, we connected 3 capacitors in series, and the second one we connected them in parallel.

This is what I've written in my report so far:

1. Yes it is. In series, all capacitors have a different voltage. If not discharged properly, the capacitors may have accumulated charge stored in them. This charge could be added to the current already flowing thought the circuit, thus tampering with the voltages.

2. It is not necessary to discharge a capacitor in parallel. Contrarily to capacitors in series, capacitors in parallel all have the same voltage. Therefore, even if charge accumulates, the voltage measured shouldn’t be affected.

Does that make sense?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
since you give no description of the experiment, one can randomly choose and answer and then create a condition under which it would be correct.

If you want a helpful answer, give a helpful question. Just saying parallel and series is meaningless without knowing WHERE the elements are and what other elements are in the circuit.
 
phinds said:
since you give no description of the experiment, one can randomly choose and answer and then create a condition under which it would be correct.

If you want a helpful answer, give a helpful question. Just saying parallel and series is meaningless without knowing WHERE the elements are and what other elements are in the circuit.
Sorry, there was a 7V battery connected that had a wire going to the 3 capacitors, which connected to a switch then back to the battery. We were told to discharge the capacitors by simply taking a wire and putting one end on the positive side of the capacitor and the other on the negative side, allowing the charge to flow through and eliminating the remaining charge.
 
both experiments would have different results depending on whether or not you discharged the caps first, so I'd say yes, to get consitent results you should in both cases discharge first.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top