Net Electric Field of 2 charged particles fixed to X-axis

Oaksmack
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
2 Particles are fixed to an x-axis:
q1=2.1*10^-8 C @ x=.2m
q2=-4.00q1 @ x=.7m

We are trying to find the coordinate on the x-axis where the net electric field produced by the particles = 0.
The equation I have is

E=((8.99*10^9)q)/r^2

I got what i thought was q2 first, by multiplying 2.1*10^-8 by -4.00 to get -8.4*10^-8. From there I equated E1 & E2:
((8.99*10^9)(2.1*10^-8))/r^2 = ((8.99*10^9)(-8.4*10^-8))/r^2
from there, I had no idea how to solve for r.
I simplified the constant 8.99*10^9 with the respective q's, but just couldn't figure out how to solve for r without it canceling into 1 and having two numbers equaling each other. :confused:
Please help, I have a number of problems like this to do for this chapter.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Almost correct except r in your equation
r is a distance from the charge you are considering. So each r on the left side and right side of your equation should not be equal. One should be include the distance between two point charges.
 
Wait, so one of the r's should be .5m, the distance between the two particles?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top