Net force due to gravity (sort of conceptual questions)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the net gravitational force acting on mass m4, positioned at the center of an equilateral triangle formed by three equal masses m. The consensus is that mass M must equal m for the forces to balance, despite an alternative conceptual approach suggesting M should equal 2m based on the center of mass of the two bottom masses. Participants clarify that the gravitational field created by the masses must be calculated directly rather than relying on simplified center of mass assumptions. Additionally, when calculating forces in a system, it is crucial to use the correct distance for each component to avoid significant errors. Understanding the principles of gravitational fields and their calculations is essential for solving these types of problems accurately.
LogicX
Messages
175
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



http://edugen.wiley.com/edugen/courses/crs4957/art/qb/qu/c13/fig13_37.gif

Masses m are the same on the bottom, and the net gravitational force is 0 on m4 which is located at the center of an equilateral triangle. What is the mass of M?

Homework Equations



Fg=GmM/r^2

The Attempt at a Solution



Ok, obviously the answer is that M=m because its an equilateral triangle so the masses on all three sides must be the same. But I was thinking about it conceptually a different way and I'm not sure why it doesn't work.

Lets say you find the center of mass of the bottom two. It is located halfway between them both. So you can consider both masses of m as if they were in that point right? So the center of mass (with mass 2m) is in line with M and the same distance away from m4 as M, because m4 is in the center of the triangle. So in order for M to offset 2m to 0, M must equal 2m. What am I doing wrong here?

Here is another one.

http://edugen.wiley.com/edugen/courses/crs4957/art/qb/qu/c13/qu_1.8.gif

What is the net force on the center mass, in component form? (and you are given the different masses of all the particles, and a side length of the square)

I got this one correct using the regular method of getting each force from each mass on the center mass (with r being half of the diagonal through the square) to get a vector and then using sin45 and cos45 to divide the vector into component form. But then I got it wrong by doing it this way:

Instead of getting the magnitude of the total vector I tried to solve for each component separately. So taking an example force, say the y component of the force of mass 2 on mass 5. I tried to use an r value of side length/2 because that is how far away it is in the y direction. Shouldn't this have worked?

Thanks.

Homework Statement


Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
LogicX said:
Lets say you find the center of mass of the bottom two. It is located halfway between them both. So you can consider both masses of m as if they were in that point right?
No. If the two masses were in a uniform gravitational field and you wanted to find the net force acting on them, then you can use that approach. But that's not what's going on here. Here you are trying to find the field created by those masses.

Actually do the calculation of the field created by the two masses at point m4. Then compare it to the field from a single mass of 2m directly below m4.
 
LogicX said:
Instead of getting the magnitude of the total vector I tried to solve for each component separately. So taking an example force, say the y component of the force of mass 2 on mass 5. I tried to use an r value of side length/2 because that is how far away it is in the y direction. Shouldn't this have worked?
No. Take this example. Mass m is at the origin. The point P is at (1 m, 10000000 m). Clearly the force at P is small because it's over 10000000 m away from mass m. If you computed the x-component based on a distance of only 1 m, you'd be wildly wrong.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top