- #1
cala
- 194
- 0
Hello.
Please, take a read to
www.geocities.com/k_pullo/PM3.htm
It's an study based on the Butch Lafonte's equilibrium motor.
Please, forget the claims, and take a look under classical physical principles.
Basically, on normal motors we use the electric energy to impulse the motor, and get similar mechanical work. On this device, the iron cores do the mechanical work, and the electric energy on coils "hide" the iron cores at proper timing, using electric energy, but almost without doing work.
The simulations give a possitive result.
Could you tell me what do you think?
Forget the regrets about me, or if it's free energy. Just see the physical fact that a magnet between two north poles (or two south poles) could feel no oposition nor atraction to rotate properly disposed. It could just feel no effect, and also it could cause no backEMF effect on the coils.
I wish you could see this fact with clear eyes. Sure you have more knowledge about physics than me, and i hope you could see what I'm talking behind this knowledge to explain if it works like spected, and not using other physics concepts to opose the results with the thermodinamics laws, the enthropy, the losses, the "build-it", etc...
If you answer that the method explained can't work, just tell me how do you get that conclusion. If you talk about all the laws that could restrict the working, please, talk me about how they affect this system specifically, and if you see a solution to avoid that problem, please, let me know.
If i expose this method to "physics people", they will use physics to go against it, not to analyze it.
If i expose this method to "free energy people" they will say it sure works, using physics or not.
So am I alone about this concept?.
Please, i need REAL physics people that uses physics knowledge like a tool, not like a weapon.
Thanks.
Please, take a read to
www.geocities.com/k_pullo/PM3.htm
It's an study based on the Butch Lafonte's equilibrium motor.
Please, forget the claims, and take a look under classical physical principles.
Basically, on normal motors we use the electric energy to impulse the motor, and get similar mechanical work. On this device, the iron cores do the mechanical work, and the electric energy on coils "hide" the iron cores at proper timing, using electric energy, but almost without doing work.
The simulations give a possitive result.
Could you tell me what do you think?
Forget the regrets about me, or if it's free energy. Just see the physical fact that a magnet between two north poles (or two south poles) could feel no oposition nor atraction to rotate properly disposed. It could just feel no effect, and also it could cause no backEMF effect on the coils.
I wish you could see this fact with clear eyes. Sure you have more knowledge about physics than me, and i hope you could see what I'm talking behind this knowledge to explain if it works like spected, and not using other physics concepts to opose the results with the thermodinamics laws, the enthropy, the losses, the "build-it", etc...
If you answer that the method explained can't work, just tell me how do you get that conclusion. If you talk about all the laws that could restrict the working, please, talk me about how they affect this system specifically, and if you see a solution to avoid that problem, please, let me know.
If i expose this method to "physics people", they will use physics to go against it, not to analyze it.
If i expose this method to "free energy people" they will say it sure works, using physics or not.
So am I alone about this concept?.
Please, i need REAL physics people that uses physics knowledge like a tool, not like a weapon.
Thanks.