Calculating Normal Force on a Snow Sled with Newton's Laws

  • Thread starter Thread starter roam
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the normal force on a snow sled with a total mass of 56.0 kg descending a 35.0° slope at a constant speed, it is crucial to incorporate the coefficient of kinetic friction, which is 0.13. The sled's weight creates a gravitational force that can be resolved into components parallel and perpendicular to the slope. Since the sled is moving at constant speed, the net force in the direction perpendicular to the slope is zero, allowing for the calculation of the normal force. The frictional force can be determined using the normal force, leading to the correct magnitude of the reactive force being 450.0 N. Properly incorporating these factors is essential for an accurate solution.
roam
Messages
1,265
Reaction score
12
(a) A snow sled with a child secured safely to it has a total mass of 56.0 kg. It is lowered at a constant speed of 1.1 m s−1 down a slope of angle 35.0 ° with respect to the horizontal (as shown above) for a distance d = 18.0 m. The coefficient of kinetic friction between the sled and the snow is 0.13.

Note: g = 9.8 m s–2. Air resistance is negligible at these speeds.

Find the magnitude of the reactive force, N, on the sled.




The correct answer should be 450.0 but my answer is different. I don't know how to solve this question but here's my attemp:



ΣFx = 1.1 cos 35.0° = 0.90
ΣFy = 1.1 sin 35.0 = 0.63



a = \frac{\sum F}{m}

ax = 0.90 ÷ 56.0 = 0.01
ay = 0.63 ÷ 56.0 = 0.01

Now to find the magnitude:

\sqrt{0.01^2 + 0.01^2} = 0.01 "?"

≠ 450.0 N

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
roam said:
The coefficient of kinetic friction between the sled and the snow is 0.13.

You failed to incorporate this into your solution. Taking this into consideration should help ^^
 
Nabeshin said:
You failed to incorporate this into your solution. Taking this into consideration should help ^^

How can I incorporate that in my solution?

ƒk = μkn
ƒ = 0.13 \times n

So, what should I use for the n, the magnitude of the normal force?
 
Well, you had no problem resolving the gravity force into it's down-the-hill component. Seeing as the object seems not to be accelerating in the new "y" direction, what can we say about the forces there? This should help you solve for normal force.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top