Newton's 2nd Law: Pile of Books on a Table Being Moved

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the application of Newton's 2nd Law in a scenario involving a pile of books on a table being moved. There is confusion regarding the direction of static friction, with one participant arguing that it should oppose the motion of the table while the correction suggests it aligns with the motion. The role of static friction is clarified, emphasizing that it prevents relative motion between surfaces. When the table is pushed, static friction acts to move the books in the same direction as the table, while also opposing the table's acceleration. The conversation highlights the complexity of interpreting forces in motion and the importance of understanding static friction's role.
Serbiwni
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Carl tries to move a table, which has a pile of books sitting on it of total mass m_books. The dynamic coefficient of friction is μd (between the table and floor) and the static coefficient of friction between the table and books is μs . Determine the maximum force that Carl can apply to the table so that the books do not slide.
Assume the books do not slide with respect to each other.
Numerical application: μs = 0.75, μd = 0.5, m_books = 3 kg, m_table = 10 kg

1) Draw the free body diagram of the books.
Relevant Equations
.
I drew a free body diagram for the books but it's not the same one in the correction. The static force Fs between the books and the table must be opposite to the motion but the correction does not the same and puts that vector in the same direction as the motion. Here's a drawing of the situation and also the free body diagram of the correction, as you can see its direction is also the motion's one.
 

Attachments

  • Capture d’écran 2019-11-16 à 16.34.34.png
    Capture d’écran 2019-11-16 à 16.34.34.png
    13.2 KB · Views: 310
  • Capture d’écran 2019-11-16 à 16.38.11.png
    Capture d’écran 2019-11-16 à 16.38.11.png
    1.5 KB · Views: 205
Physics news on Phys.org
With static friction there is no motion between surfaces. Static friction acts to prevent motion between two surfaces.
 
PeroK said:
With static friction there is no motion between surfaces. Static friction acts to prevent motion between two surfaces.
So if the motion is to the right, the static friction must be to the left right ? But that's not what the correction says. Who is wrong ?
 
Serbiwni said:
So if the motion is to the right, the static friction must be to the left right ? But that's not what the correction says. Who is wrong ?

First, if there was no friction.

If the table is pushed to the right, the books would not move at all. Relative to the table the books would slide across the surface of the table.

Second, if there is static friction:

If the table is pushed to the right, the static friction will pull the books to the right also. And, by Newton's third law, the books will retard the motion of the table.

So, it depends how you look at. The force of static friction acting on the table will oppose the acceleration of the table. But, the static friction acting on the books will accelerate the books.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top