Is the Force on Box A Correctly Calculated?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the force exerted by box B on box A in a system of three boxes on a frictionless surface. The user questions their teacher's method, which involved isolating box B and using net force calculations, specifically noting confusion over the use of negative signs in the equations. They propose an alternative approach by calculating the net forces on both boxes B and C together. The user seeks validation of their method and expresses frustration over the lack of responses. The thread highlights the importance of understanding Newton's Third Law and the correct application of force direction in calculations.
Precursor
Messages
219
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Newton's Third Law problem

Homework Statement


Three boxes, A, B, and C, are positioned next to each other on a horizontal, frictionless surface. An applied force acting on box A causes all the boxes to accelerate at 1.5m/s^{2}
. Calculate the force that box B exerts on box A.

http://img70.imageshack.us/img70/8836/thirdlaw2cf8.png​
[/URL]

Homework Equations


F_{A on B}= -F_{B on A}
F=ma

The Attempt at a Solution


What seems to be the issue is how my teacher solved this problem. I have only realized this problem, so I can't have asked her personally. What she did is isolate box B and find the F_{net} acting on it. This is the calculation she did:

F_{net}= F_{A on B}-F_{C on B}
F_{net}= m_{B}a -(-7.5 N)
F_{net}= (10 Kg)(1.5m/s^{2}) + 7.5 N
F_{net}= 23 N


However, what confused me is the two negative signs she put infront of the 7.5 N. I think only one would suffice to take into consideration that F_{C on B} is a negative value, being that its direction is left.

I solved this problem taking a different approach. I found F_{net} of box B and C, and added them together. Here are my calculations:

F_{net}= m_{B}a + m_{C}a
F_{net}= (10 Kg)(1.5m/s^{2}) + (5.0 Kg)(1.5m/s^{2})
F_{net}= 23 N


Could someone please confirm whether my method of solving the problem is correct or not?​
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyone?

Is their something wrong or confusing with my post that nobody has replied yet?
 
...

...anyone please?
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top