Nonconducting Rod: How to Determine Electric Potential at x=L+d?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gogeta007
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electric Rod
Gogeta007
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



There is a nonconducting rod of negligible thickness located along the x axis; its ends have coordinates x = 0 and x = L. It has a positive, nonuniform, linear charge density (lambda) = (alpha)x; alpha is constant. An infinite distance away, th eelectric potential is zero. Show that th electric potential at the location x=L+d is given by:

V= ( alpha/4pi(epsilon0) ) ( (L+d) ln(1+L/d) -L )

Homework Equations



V= q/4pi epsilon r


The Attempt at a Solution



V = integral of dv
dv= dq/4pi(epsilon)r
dq=lambdadx
dq= alpha x dx

dV = ( (alpha) x dx) / (4 pi epsilon (d-x) )

V=constants <integral> xdx/ d-x <===== integration table

<integral> udu/a+bu = 1/b2 (a + bu - a*ln(a + bu) <evaluate from 0 to L>

when I evaluate i get:

(constants) * d-d-L d*ln( d / d - L )

and that's not what I am supposed to get =/



ty
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your expression d - x for the distance between your charge element and the location of interest is incorrect. Read the problem. The point of interest is at distance d from the end of the rod at x = L, so any point on the rod must be at distance greater than d from the point of interest. Draw a picture and see for yourself what that distance ought to be.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top