Obtain an expression for the expectation value in terms of energy

blueyellow

Homework Statement


The ground state wave function for a particle of mass m moving with energy E in a one-dimensional harmonic oscillator potential with classical frequency omega is:

u(subscript 0) (x)= N(subscript 0) exp((-alpha^2)(x^2)/2) and alpha=sqrt (m *omega/h-bar)

where N(subscript 0) is some normalisation constant

a) for the ground state, show explicitly that the quantum mechanical expectation values <x> and <p> are both zero
b) if the uncertainties delta x and delta p are given by:

(delta x)^2=<x^2>-<x>^2
(delta p)^2=<p^2>-<p>^2

obtain an expression for the expectation value of E in terms of the uncertainties
c)If ΔxΔp = c for c a constant, deduce a value for c by minimising the ground state energy. What significance
does the value of c have in light of the uncertainty principle ?

The Attempt at a Solution



I haven't tried part a yet, but for part b:

<E>=<p^2>/2m
=((delta p)^2 - <p>^2)^2)/2m

I don't know if the above is correct and I have no idea how to get it in terms of delta x. Please help
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The expectation value (average over an ensemble) for the Hamiltonian is

\langle H\rangle =\frac{1}{2m} \langle p^2\rangle + C \langle x^2\rangle

, wherer C=C(m,ω)>0.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top