Optics - find thickness of glass

AI Thread Summary
To determine the minimum thickness of glass required for coherent light waves to be out of phase at the screen, one must consider the refractive index of the glass (1.51) and the wavelength of light. The optical path length, defined as the product of the refractive index and physical path length, is crucial in this calculation. The relationship between the optical path lengths of the two light sources must differ by one wavelength for them to be out of phase. The formula t = d - (λ / (n-1)) provides the minimum thickness, where t is the glass thickness, d is the path length of the upper source, and λ is the wavelength of light. Any thickness greater than this minimum will also result in the waves being out of phase.
cantdophysics
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I don't even know where to start with this question!

Two coherent sources are traveling as shown below. Find the minimum thickness of the glass (n=1.51) for the waves to be out of phase at the screen
 

Attachments

  • phy.jpg
    phy.jpg
    6 KB · Views: 559
Physics news on Phys.org
What's the wavelength of the light? You need that to find the answer.

Things to consider: What happens to the wavelength of light when it passes from air (n = 1) to glass (n =1.51)? Then ask, when light travels a distance L, what happens to it's phase? What's the difference in phase for the light in air versus the light in the glass? (Count the wavelengths!) For them to be out of phase, the number of wavelengths must differ by (n+\frac{1}{2}) (where n is an integer >= 0); for the minimum thickness, choose n = 0.
 
.To find the thickness of the glass in this scenario, we will need to use the concept of optical path length. This is the distance that light travels through a medium, and it is dependent on the refractive index of the medium. In this case, the refractive index of the glass is given as 1.51.

We can start by drawing a diagram of the setup, with the two coherent sources and the screen. The light from each source will travel through the glass medium before reaching the screen. The light from the lower source will take a longer path due to the added thickness of the glass, causing it to be out of phase with the light from the upper source.

Next, we can use the equation for optical path length, which is given as: optical path length = refractive index * physical path length. Here, the physical path length is the thickness of the glass that we are trying to find.

Since we want the waves to be out of phase at the screen, we can set the optical path length for the lower source to be equal to one wavelength longer than the optical path length for the upper source. This can be represented as:

(n * d) - (n * t) = λ

Where:
n = refractive index of glass (1.51)
d = physical path length for light from the upper source
t = physical path length for light from the lower source
λ = wavelength of light

Solving for t, we get:

t = d - (λ / (n-1))

This formula gives us the minimum thickness of the glass (t) required for the waves to be out of phase at the screen. We can plug in the values for d and λ, and the given refractive index of 1.51 to get our final answer.

It is important to note that this is the minimum thickness required for the waves to be out of phase. Any thickness greater than this will also result in the waves being out of phase. Additionally, if the thickness of the glass is an integer multiple of the wavelength, the waves will be in phase again.

In conclusion, to find the minimum thickness of the glass for the waves to be out of phase at the screen, we need to use the equation for optical path length and set it equal to one wavelength longer for the lower source. This will give us the formula t = d - (λ / (n-1)), where t is the thickness of the glass.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top