PhanthomJay said:
There are some errors here. And missing info on loading. Is the 3300 pound applied at the top of the motor along the x-axis in case 1 and then along the y-axis in case 2? Or are the loads applied along both axes at the same time?
2 separate cases, first along X axis and then along Y axis starting from the centre line.
PhanthomJay said:
Now when applied along the x-axis in case 1, it makes a big difference whether the walls of the frame act independently or as a joined pair. If independently, each wall takes half the load and the parallel axis theorem does not apply.
So can i think of this case as a cantilever beam with a load at the end?
PhanthomJay said:
If however as I suspect the side walls are tied together, then you use the parallel axis theorem and on determining bending stress, use full load not half load, and your Ix must be doubled since there are 2 sided
So M = (3300)(35)= 115500 lb-in
Ix = 2 [bh
3/12 + Ad
2] = 2(270.11) = 540.22 in
4
PhanthomJay said:
and your 'c ' distance is quite wrong...what should it be?
from my understanding, C is the distance from the Neutral Axis to the highest stress point. Since the cross section is a rectangle, half would be in tension and half in compression starting at the midpoint. Since the height is 1.25" i took the half of that value as my distance c.
Do I have to take into the 5.75" from the centreline aswell? c would then be 5.75+(1.25/2)=6.375in >>>which is the same as my distance d above
Substituting my new values σ=Mc/I = (115500)(6.375)/540.22 = 1363 psi = 9.4 MPa, still relatively smaller than in other direction.
PhanthomJay said:
Now for the other axis Iy about the x-axis is determined without any distance to the parallel x axis, because the centroid of the walls and frame coincide.
Thank you, I had a feeling that was why but wasn't sure.
But in this case, since I took half the load and analyses only 1 side of the frame, there is no need to double it like in the above case?