Parallel flow pipe network help

AI Thread Summary
In a parallel flow pipe network, flow conservation dictates that the total flow entering equals the sum of flows in the two pipes, expressed as Q = Q1 + Q2. The head loss in both pipes must be equal, leading to the need for the friction factor, which can be calculated using the Swamee and Jain formula, dependent on the Reynolds Number and flow velocity. The discussion highlights the challenge of determining the friction factor without iterative methods or complex software. To find the total pressure loss, one can assume no frictional losses and solve for velocities in terms of loss coefficients, ultimately leading to the pressure drop equations. This approach simplifies the calculation of flow rates and pressure loss in the system.
hydronicengr
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Let's say I have a simple parallel flow problem as shown in the attachment. The flow is pressurized and the downstream of the return goes back to a piping system that is negligible. It does not vent to atmosphere.

I've tried reading up on the subject, but I got stuck at a certain point. At point A, I know that the flow going in must equal the flow going out to the two pipes. Therefore, it will look like Q = Q1+Q2. Expanding Q1 and Q2 gives me V*A for each respective pipe.

I also know that the head loss of Pipe 1 must equal the head loss of Pipe 2. Expanding those equations, I find that I am faced with an unknown, which is the friction factor for each pipe. The friction factor can be explicitly calculated using the Swamee and Jain formula, but is dependent on the Reynolds Number, which is dependent on the flow velocity, which is ultimately dependent on the flow rate of each of the pipes. After getting the friction factor, everything else is easy. Simply plug the velocities from the head loss equations back into the Q formula shown above and solve for the unknown.

I know one can attain the correct friction factor value by many iterations, but is there a way without doing iterations by hand or by Excel and not fancy software?

Also, how would I find the total pressure loss of the system?

Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • diagram.jpg
    diagram.jpg
    20.4 KB · Views: 590
Engineering news on Phys.org
I'd say assume no frictional losses, then solve in terms of bend losses etc. You can then obtain V1 in terms of V2,eg. V1= sqrt(k2/k1)V2 (Where k is the sum of the loss coefficients ,the Ks will vary for each pipe.). Then plug that into Q=A1V1 + A2V2 to get the value of V2, and subsequently Q2 and Q1. The pressure drop in each pipe is the same, so your pressure drop per unit weight (in metres) = k1(V1^2)/2g or k2(v2^2)/2g.
Hope this helps
 
How did you find PF?: Via Google search Hi, I have a vessel I 3D printed to investigate single bubble rise. The vessel has a 4 mm gap separated by acrylic panels. This is essentially my viewing chamber where I can record the bubble motion. The vessel is open to atmosphere. The bubble generation mechanism is composed of a syringe pump and glass capillary tube (Internal Diameter of 0.45 mm). I connect a 1/4” air line hose from the syringe to the capillary The bubble is formed at the tip...
Thread 'Physics of Stretch: What pressure does a band apply on a cylinder?'
Scenario 1 (figure 1) A continuous loop of elastic material is stretched around two metal bars. The top bar is attached to a load cell that reads force. The lower bar can be moved downwards to stretch the elastic material. The lower bar is moved downwards until the two bars are 1190mm apart, stretching the elastic material. The bars are 5mm thick, so the total internal loop length is 1200mm (1190mm + 5mm + 5mm). At this level of stretch, the load cell reads 45N tensile force. Key numbers...
I'd like to create a thread with links to 3-D Printer resources, including printers and software package suggestions. My motivations are selfish, as I have a 3-D printed project that I'm working on, and I'd like to buy a simple printer and use low cost software to make the first prototype. There are some previous threads about 3-D printing like this: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/are-3d-printers-easy-to-use-yet.917489/ but none that address the overall topic (unless I've missed...
Back
Top