Please help with an exercise in mathematical methods for physicists

benjamin198
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Derive the equation of motion of a particle of mass m and charge q moving in three dimensional space under a Coulombic attraction toward a fixed center.

I have the answer for a plane but a i need it for the space
1%2B.jpg

Homework Equations


2.jpg

Mathematical Methods for Scientists and Engineers (Donald A. mcquarrie), chapter 20,.

The Attempt at a Solution



I did the exercise in polar coordinates
IMAG0415.jpg


IMAG0416.jpg

Homework Statement

 
Physics news on Phys.org
The OP shows thumbnails of images, but you can't open the images themselves. We can't see the problem statement or your work.
 
in this link looks better
http://htmlimg4.scribdassets.com/6vgsfinm2o2p92ha/images/4-e24c6fe708.jpg
http://htmlimg3.scribdassets.com/6vgsfinm2o2p92ha/images/5-d4de0e56dc.jpg
 
You should use spherical coordinates. You don't have any constraints, so, just write the Langrangian, and apply Lagrange equations.

##L=T-V\\ x=r\sin \phi \cos\theta \\ y=r\sin \phi \sin \theta \\ z=r\cos \phi##
## T=\frac{1}{2}m \left[ \dot {x}^2 + \dot {y}^2+\dot {z}^2 \right]=\frac{1}{2}m \left[ \dot r^2 +r^2\sin^2 \phi\dot \theta^2+r^2\dot \phi^2 \right]##, ##V=\frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0}\frac{q}{r} ##

You'll have three equations, one for each of the generalized coordinates ##r,\theta,\phi##.

For example, r:

##\frac{d}{dt}\left(\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot r}\right)-\frac{\partial L}{\partial r}=0 \\ \therefore m\ddot r-mr(\dot \phi^2+\sin^2\phi\dot\theta^2)+\frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0}\frac{q}{r^2}=0##

(I didn't check if what I did is right, you should do it).
 
Last edited:
A charged particle moving a coulombic potential in space does move in a plane. The plane is defined by the center of attraction and the vectors corresponding to the initial displacement of the charge and the initial velocity of the charge. You don't have to resolve the dynamical problem. You just have to figure out how to transform the planar solution into 3d coordinates.
 
Yes, that's because of the conservation of angular momentum, that you can derive from the equations of motion from the Lagrangian I gave (if it was set right, of course). As the force is central, there are no external torques, so the angular momentum is conserved. If you set an initial speed and an initial position, you can get from the vector product the direction on which the angular momentum goes, and define the plane of movement from it. So, it can actually be properly done on cylindrical coordinates instead of polar coordinates, but you can also derive all this from the equations of motions in spherical coordinates.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top