Point-Plane Electric Field Intensity

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the electric field intensity near the tip of an electrode in a point-plane geometry, particularly in the context of dielectric media. Participants explore the derivation and implications of a specific equation for electric field intensity, as well as its relevance to practical applications and theoretical models.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Rob presents an equation for electric field intensity near an electrode tip and seeks its derivation or reference, noting a lack of coverage in available textbooks.
  • One participant questions the necessity of including the tip radius in the equation, suggesting that a point could be assumed to have zero radius, but acknowledges potential complexities in deriving the field using integrals or Laplace's equation.
  • Rob shares insights from practical experience, indicating that the tip radius significantly affects field intensity due to the divergence of the electric field, which he aims to include in his dissertation.
  • Another participant draws a comparison between Rob's equation and the electric field around a wire parallel to a ground plane, noting a different form for the field around a conducting sphere, which raises questions about the consistency of the models.
  • There is a general acknowledgment of the logarithmic relationship in the context of the circular tip shape, but uncertainty remains regarding its derivation and application.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity of the tip radius in the equation and the methods for deriving the electric field intensity. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing perspectives on the topic.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in existing literature regarding the specific equation and its derivation, as well as the dependence on the geometry of the electrode and the assumptions made in modeling the electric field.

rpiengineer
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi folks. I have read in several papers that the electric field intensity adjacent to the very tip of an electrode (the "point" in a point-plane geometry) surrounded by a dielectric medium is given by

2V / [r ln(4d/r)]

where r is the tip radius, d is the point-plane spacing, and V is the applied voltage. The papers I have read do not give a reference for this equation, however. Does anyone know where this equation comes from? I have thought about different ways one might derive this, but my models are lacking in their use of the electrode radius "r". The undergraduate and graduate textbooks I have available do not address this particular problem.

Many thanks in advance to anyone who can help me here !

Rob
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
That's kind of weird, why would you need a radius of a fine point tip? If it's a tip then you could assume it's just a point with 0 radius, but obviously that's not the case, so unless there is a trick but I don't see one right now, other than to use nasty double or triple integrals in polar coordinates. Or solve the laplace equation, but the boundary conditions would kill you.

I will try and look into it more.
 
Thanks so much. I know, having done endurance testing on polyethylene with embedded needles, that the tip radius is the most important factor in knowing the highest field intensity. I suppose this is because the smaller the radius, the more divergent the field, thus the higher the field intensity in the dielectric right next to the metal tip. We measure the tip radius of etched electrode needles before we insert them into molten polyethylene, then cool it to room temperature for testing. I just don't know how the many authors who make use of this relationship arrived at it. I would like to include the rationale - if not the entire derivation, which may be a bit long - in my dissertation.

Again, many many thanks for any help you can provide !

Rob
 
Not sure if this helps much, but the form of your solution is very similar to the fields around a wire of radius r parallel to a ground plane a distance d away. If the potential separating the wire and the plane is V, you get that the E-field at the wire is approximately:

E = V/(r*ln(2d/r)).

When I do it with a conducting sphere above the plane, I get

E = 2d*V/(r*(2d-r)),

however, which does not have the same form...
 
Last edited:
I agree, the logarithm must come from the circular tip shape somehow. Hmmmm...not sure what to think at this point.

Thanks for looking into it for me !
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
573
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K