Potential Difference between Concentric Circles

AI Thread Summary
The problem involves calculating the potential difference between three concentric circles filled with gas that breaks down at an electric field of 1.6 x 10^7 V/m. The solution requires determining the necessary net charges for the innermost and middle circles to maintain this electric field at their surfaces. The key realization is that the circles are actually cylinders, leading to an electric field that decreases as 1/r rather than 1/r^2. By integrating the electric fields from the innermost to the outermost cylinder, the calculated potential difference aligns with the book's answer of 31.1 MV. The middle circle must be maintained at a potential of 18.8 MV relative to the outermost circle to ensure the gas breakdown condition is met.
codfishman
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Three concentric circles of radii 1.5m, 2.5m, and 4m are filled with a gas that breaks down in electric fields greater than 1.6 x 10^7 volt/meters. What is the highest potential difference that can be maintained between the innermost circle and the outermost circle. (Hint: the middle circle must be maintained at a potential such that breakdown of the gas is about to occur on its outer surface as well as on the surface of the inner most circle).


Homework Equations


Change in potential from A to B = \int E \cdot dl


The Attempt at a Solution


I calculated the net charge that the inner most circle needed to have to produce an electric field of 1.6 * 10^7 V/m at its surface. I also calculated net charge needed by the 2nd circle so that the sum of the two fields would be 1.6 * 10^7 V/m at the outer surface of the second circle (as per the hint given). However, when I then integrate the net electric field from 1.5 m to 4.0 m, I don't get the answer given in the book.

The answer given in the book is 31.1 MV for reference. The book also claims that 2nd circle must be maintained at a potential of 18.8 MV (I think relative to the outermost circle).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Problem solved. I realized that the "circles" in question were actually supposed to be cylinders (of unspecified length). In that case, the field generated by the cylinders drops off as 1/r, not 1/r^2 as I had assumed (see http://www.davidpace.com/physics/em-topics/capacitance-cylinders.htm#em6eq2 )

Thus if E = Q / (2 Pi e0 L r), let s = Q / (2 Pi e0). For the first cylinder, s1 must be equal to 2.4 * 10^7 so that on its surface the field is 1.6*10^7. Then s2 for the second cylinder is 1.6*10^7, so that above its surface the field is 1.6*10^7. Then we integrate s1 from 1.5m to 2.5m and then integrate (s1+s2) from 2.5m to 4.0m. The sum of these two integrations is 3.106*10^7 volts ~ 3.11 * 10^7 volts = 31.1 MV
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top