Potential Energy of Length Contraction

Albertgauss
Gold Member
Messages
294
Reaction score
37
Is there any potential energy associated with length contraction? If I start with a rod at rest, and accelerate it to a relavsitic kinetic energy, the rod also length contracts, at least as viewed from the ground frame watching the rod go by. When the rod decelerates and comes to rest, it will extend to its rest frame length. Is there any release of energy associated with this? I presume there would be, since pieces in the rod move a length "dx" back into their "rest frame postions" and there is a Force Causing deceleration (though how this gets the energy out of the contracted rod, I'm not sure exactly), thus, there should be some kind of work associated with the process. Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Albertgauss said:
Is there any potential energy associated with length contraction? If I start with a rod at rest, and accelerate it to a relavsitic kinetic energy, the rod also length contracts, at least as viewed from the ground frame watching the rod go by. When the rod decelerates and comes to rest, it will extend to its rest frame length. Is there any release of energy associated with this? I presume there would be, since pieces in the rod move a length "dx" back into their "rest frame postions" and there is a Force Causing deceleration (though how this gets the energy out of the contracted rod, I'm not sure exactly), thus, there should be some kind of work associated with the process. Any ideas?

No, there is no potential energy associated with length contraction.

Note that from the point of view of an observer on the rod, at any time when the rod is not being accelerated or decelerated (and has settled back into a stable shape) the rod looks exactly the same as it does in the original rest state, with exactly the same internal forces.
 
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
Abstract The gravitational-wave signal GW250114 was observed by the two LIGO detectors with a network matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 80. The signal was emitted by the coalescence of two black holes with near-equal masses ## m_1=33.6_{-0.8}^{+1.2} M_{⊙} ## and ## m_2=32.2_{-1. 3}^{+0.8} M_{⊙}##, and small spins ##\chi_{1,2}\leq 0.26 ## (90% credibility) and negligible eccentricity ##e⁢\leq 0.03.## Postmerger data excluding the peak region are consistent with the dominant quadrupolar...
Back
Top